M/S BHOLA FOOD PRODUCTS(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. CIT,(OSD), ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had not produced sufficient evidence, such as a stock register, to substantiate its claims regarding expenses and closing stock. Therefore, the matter was restored to the AO for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
Following a search and seizure operation, the assessee's assessment was framed under Section 153A. The assessee challenged the validity of the assessment and specific disallowances, claiming no incriminating material was found during the search. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) made additions based on discrepancies in stock and expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment framed under Section 153A was valid without incriminating material, and whether the disallowances of expenses and additions to income based on stock discrepancies were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 132(1),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 37(1),Section 145(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI.VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These two appeals filed by the assessee, being ITA Nos. 66 & 153/Alld/2013 for assessment year’s(ay’s) : 2005-06 and 2009-10 respectively are directed against two separate appellate orders , firstly appellate order dated 21.11.2012 in appeal no. 499/JCIT/CC/Alld/11-12 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Allahabad , U.P. (hereinafter called “ the CIT(A)”) for ay: 2005-06 and secondly appellate order dated 29.01.2013 passed by learned CIT(A) in appeal number 503/JCIT/CC/Alld/11-12 for ay: 2009-10. The appellate proceedings had arisen before ld. CIT(A) from sepa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026