KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

145/- as against actual sales of Rs.37,82,854,283/-, was due to an error in the computer software and improper commands giving at the time of taking print out during the course of the search on 27.08.2009. By way of evidence, it was pointed out that the trial balance as on 31.03.2010, was for the period

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal in ITA No

section 145(3) to this extent and made an addition of Rs.1,00,000/- on this account, thereby giving the assessee relief of Rs.86,94,292/-. 3. The second issue in the Department’s appeal is the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete an addition of Rs.2,66,73,629/- on account of unaccounted purchases, without appreciating that

ACIT,, ALLAHABAD vs. M/S KESARWANI & CO., ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal in ITA No

section 145(3) to this extent and made an addition of Rs.1,00,000/- on this account, thereby giving the assessee relief of Rs.86,94,292/-. 3. The second issue in the Department’s appeal is the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete an addition of Rs.2,66,73,629/- on account of unaccounted purchases, without appreciating that

KESARWANI & C0.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT., ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

145/- as against actual sales of Rs.37,82,854,283/-, was due to an error in the computer software and improper commands giving at the time of taking print out during the course of the search on 27.08.2009. By way of evidence, it was pointed out that the trial balance as on 31.03.2010, was for the period

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

145/- as against actual sales of Rs.37,82,854,283/-, was due to an error in the computer software and improper commands giving at the time of taking print out during the course of the search on 27.08.2009. By way of evidence, it was pointed out that the trial balance as on 31.03.2010, was for the period

ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD.,MIRZAPUR vs. ASSTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, MIRZAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

depreciation allowable under the 1961 Act) on the differential amount, leading to disallowance of Rs. 28,473/-, and thus the total additions to the tune of Rs. 1,14,416/- stoodadded to the income of the assesseeby the AO, vide assessment order dated 23.03.2013 passed by the AO u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act. 4. Aggrieved by an assessment

ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD,,MIRZAPUR vs. JT. C.I.T.,, MIRZAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

depreciation allowable under the 1961 Act) on the differential amount, leading to disallowance of Rs. 28,473/-, and thus the total additions to the tune of Rs. 1,14,416/- stoodadded to the income of the assesseeby the AO, vide assessment order dated 23.03.2013 passed by the AO u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act. 4. Aggrieved by an assessment

M/S BHOLA FOOD PRODUCTS(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. CIT,(OSD),, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee for ay: 2005-06 and 2009-10

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

145(3) of the income tax act was not invoked hence the maintenance of a part of the addition by-the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is unjustified and illegal. 5. That in any view of the matter the addition of Rs. 3,15,17,675.00 has been made by the assessing officer based on her own wishes