Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 1446 Penalty4 Section 2503 Section 2713 Section 142(1)2 Section 69A2 Section 142(1)(i)2

HUSHN JAHAN,AMETHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AMETHI, AMETHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/ALLD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad21 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Hushn Jahan V. The Income Tax Officer Palpur Raebareli Road Amethi Jagdishpur, Musfirkhana Amethi (U.P) Tan/Pan:Autpj9095P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shubham Singh, C.A. Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Singh, C.AFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R

Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 142(1)(i)Section 144Section 69A

271B and 271F of the Act, separately. 2.4 Aggrieved, the Assessee preferred an appeal before the NFAC, which partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by sustaining the addition of Rs.16,50,000/- made under section 69A of the Act and deleted the addition of Rs.9,84,000/- made by the AO being the business income of the assessee

HUSHN JAHAN,AMETHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AMETHI, AMETHI

HUSHN JAHAN,AMETHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AMETHI, AMETHI

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIR.-1, ALLAHABAD