Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 112clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 2503 Section 1443 Section 2713 Penalty3

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 53/ALLD/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Oct 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.52, 53 & 54/Alld/2024 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2011-12 Dilshad Husain, Cit(Appeal), National 178, Salreha Pacchim, Sirathu, Vs. Faceless Appeal Centre Allahabad, U.P. Pan:Acbph7430G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Yogeshwar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

112/- as per AIR. 2. That the appellant has two trucks and the details of income shown in return is as under:- A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2011-12 Dilshad Husain Income Shown Gross Receipt Truck Income u/s 44AE 84000.00 75,38,450.00 Transport Commission 116150.00 38,71,660.00 200150.00 1,14,10,110.00 3. Section 44AE provides for computing profits

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIR.-1, ALLAHABAD