Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 150(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26318 Section 271(1)(c)16 Penalty4 Section 2503 Section 1443 Section 2713 TDS2 Revision u/s 2632

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 107/ALLD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad26 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh. Pawan Chakrapani, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, CIT DR

Section 263

section 143(3) on 7.3.2014 as under:- “In this case assessee has e-filed his revised return of income for A.Y. 2011-12 declaring taxable income at Nil vide acknowledgement no. 47819688310812 on 31.08.2012. Original ITR was e-filed on 30.09.2011 vide acknowledge no. 300342981300911. The case was selected for scrutiny. Notice U/s 143(2) dt. 12.08.2013 was issued fixed

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIR.-1, ALLAHABAD

LATE SRI ZIA USMANI THROUGH L/H AND WIFE SMT. MEHVISH USMANI,ALLAHABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), ALLAHABAD