DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. SANJAY PRATAPRAI MEHTA, BHAVNAGAR
In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed
ITA 897/AHD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Apr 2024AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar
For Appellant: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri Tushar P Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri
Section 10(38)Section 271(1)(c)
211 ITR 470 (Rajasthan), the High Court held that where in quantum appeal, additions had already been deleted, no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could be levied. In the case of CIT v. Shishpal 126 Taxman
5 (Rajasthan), addition was made as unexplained investment under Section 69
DCIT vs. Sanjay Prataprai Mehta
Asst.Year –2014-15
- 10–
and penalty