PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC (1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1) , AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHEMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10.\nPer Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DALPAT BARAIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 151 of the Act, the sanction ought to have been obtained from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax or Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. Thus the approval granted u/s. 148A(d) of the Act by PCIT is invalid in law. The assessee failed to response to the various notices issued as well as the final show cause notice dated