Search: house property

7 results for “house property”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai68 Delhi14 Bangalore9 Raipur8 Ahmedabad7 Kolkata4 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Jaipur2 Pune2 Lucknow1 Cochin1 Agra1 Chennai1 Rajkot1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 1478 Section 2637 Section 55A6 Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)4 Section 1484 Section 56(2)(vii)3 Revision u/s 2633 Section 143(1)2

JAYENDRABHAI KANTILAL PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1732/AHD/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: DR. BRR KUMAR (Vice President), SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri M K Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Aasudani, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 55A

property for valuation only if in the opinion of the AO, value of the asset arrived at by the Registered Valuer is less the fair market price. In the case of Gaurangiben S Shodhan (2014) 45 Taxman.com 356 the A.Y. 2011-12. 6 jurisdictional Gujarat High Court held that prior to the amendment in section 55A with effect from

SEJALBEN PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE PR.CIT, VADODARA-1, VADODARA

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

JAYENDRABHAI KANTILAL PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), VADODARA

SEJALBEN PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE PR.CIT, VADODARA-1, VADODARA

JAYENDRABHAI KANTILAL PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), VADODARA

SEJALBEN PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE PR.CIT, VADODARA-1, VADODARA

BINITABEN SANDIPKUMAR PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE PR.CIT, VADODARA-1, VADODARA

MR. JOBANJI THAKOR,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO. WARD-3(2)(2), AHMEDABAD

KALPTARU INFRABUILD,AHMEDABAD vs. PCIT-3 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

SHRI NEERAV SHAILESH PAREKH,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11,, AHMEDABAD

ACIT CC 2(3) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. AISHA DHIRAJ GOGIA, AHMEDABAD