AIA ENGIONEERING LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

disallowance of these expenditures u/s 80G, if other conditions of section 80G are fulfilled. There is no allegation of Revenue that other conditions of Section 80G are not fulfilled. We, thus sustain the ground.” 8.2. The Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Alubond Dacs India (P.) Ltd. (cited supra) considered the provisions of Companies

GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2020-21

5 of 10 eligible for deduction under Section 80G of the Act. Further, it has been held by the other Tribunals as well that the assessee was entitled to claim deduction towards amount spent on CSR under Section 80G of the Act. Considering the provision of section 80G of the Act as well the decisions of the co-ordinate Benches

GUJARAT MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,KHANJI BHAVAN vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, AAYAKAR BHAWAN(VEJALPUR), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2020-21

disallowance of CSR expenses and the claim under section 80G. As per the assessee's submissions (noted in replies dated 06.01.2022 and 07.02.2022), and as acknowledged in the assessment order itself, the claim was restricted to donations made to institutions approved under section 80G(5

TORRENT POWER GRID LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

disallowance of these expenditures u/s 80G, if other conditions of section 80G are fulfilled. There is no allegation of Revenue that other conditions of Section 80G are not fulfilled. We, thus sustain the ground.” I.T.A.No.1191/Ahd/2025 9 A.Y. 2020-21 Page No Torrent Power Grid Ltd. vs. PCIT 8.2. The Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Alubond

SEQUEL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

disallowance of these expenditures u/s 80G, if other conditions of section 80G are fulfilled. There is no allegation of Revenue that other conditions of Section 80G are not fulfilled. We, thus sustain the ground.” 8.2. The Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Alubond Dacs India (P.) Ltd. (cited supra) considered the provisions of Companies

VIMAL COAL PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

5) of the Act.\nThese trusts are engaged in education, which is a valid CSR activity\nunder Schedule VII of the Companies Act.\nThe entire CSR expenditure was suo motu disallowed under section\n37(1) of the Act while computing business income.\nDeduction was claimed under section 80G

TORRENT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TORRENT INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED),AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

80G of the Act for CSR expenses and the expenses which had not been disallowed under Section 14A of the Act. 5

PATEL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PCIT (CENTRAL), SURAT, VADODARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

disallowance under Section 37(1) and eligibility for deduction under Section 80G, and the Revenue had not alleged any failure on part of the assessee to meet other Section 80G conditions. The Mumbai Bench in Alubond Dacs India P Ltd. vs. DCIT (2024) 163 taxmann. com 536 (Mum) held that CSR expenses, although statutorily required under Section

VIBRANT ADVERTISING PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the order passed under section 263 of the Act by the Principal CIT is quashed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

section 263 of the Act; 4. failed to appreciate that the assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as the same was duly passed basis requisites documents available with the AO and as supported by judicial precedents; and Disallowance of deduction u/s 80G: 5

TTEC INDIA CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2020-21 Ttec India Customer Solutions Pr.Commissioner Of Private Limited, Ttec Ahmedabad Vs. Income Tax-3 Opp: L.J.College Vejalpur Off: Sg Road, Makarba Ahmedabad. Fatewadi Bo, Fatewadi Ahmedabad. Pan : Aaccm 1005A (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Vishal Kabra, Ar Assessee By : Shri Rignesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03/07/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 04/07/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

disallowance of CSR expenses, based on the same the learned AO had granted deduction. It is submitted it be so held now. 5 4.2. The learned PCIT erred in law by not appreciating that just because CSR expenses are not allowed under Section 37 of the Act, it does not automatically mean that deduction under Section 80G

HESTER BIOSCIENCE LIMITED,MEHSANA vs. THE PR.CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

80G of the Act. 4. Before us, the Counsel for the assessee primarily reiterated the submissions made before PCIT. 5. On the issue of interest under section 201(1A), the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee had already disallowed

TAPOVAN EDUCATION TRUST,,VADODARA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

5)(vi) of the I.T. Act in parallel with application for registration u/s. 12A in Form No. 10A dated 10.10.2012. Since one of the requirement for approval u/s. 80G, the trust must be registered u/s. 12A of the I.T. Act. As such, the trust do not fulfill the above condition. Therefore, the trust vide letter dated 26.03.2013 received in this

TAPOVAN EDUCATION TRUST,VADODARA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

5)(vi) of the I.T. Act in parallel with application for registration u/s. 12A in Form No. 10A dated 10.10.2012. Since one of the requirement for approval u/s. 80G, the trust must be registered u/s. 12A of the I.T. Act. As such, the trust do not fulfill the above condition. Therefore, the trust vide letter dated 26.03.2013 received in this

TAPOVAN EDUCATION TRUST,,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CPC,, BANGLORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

5)(vi) of the I.T. Act in parallel with application for registration u/s. 12A in Form No. 10A dated 10.10.2012. Since one of the requirement for approval u/s. 80G, the trust must be registered u/s. 12A of the I.T. Act. As such, the trust do not fulfill the above condition. Therefore, the trust vide letter dated 26.03.2013 received in this

GMM PFAULDER LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.839/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Gmm Pfaulder Ltd. The Pr.Cit बनाम/ 3Rd Floor, B-Jadav Chambers Ahmedabad-1 V/S. Navrangpura H.O. Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ashram Road Ahmedabad – 380 009 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aabcg 0563 A (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate Revenue By : Shri Sher Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /10/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Siddhartha Nautiyal, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad-1 [Hereinafter Referred To As “Ld. Pr. Cit” For Short] Dated 07/03/2025 Passed In Exercise Of His Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act" For Short] For Assessment Year (Ay) 2020- 21. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: Gmm Pfaulder Ltd. Vs. Pcit Asst. Year : 2020-21 2

Disallowance of deduction claimed amounting to Rs.62,17,634/- under section 80G: 4.1 On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Pr. CIT erred in contending that deduction claimed under section 80G of the Act amounting to Rs.62,17,634/- on account of donation made as part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), is not allowable

AJRAMAR ACTIVE ASSORT TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT- EXEMPTION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 376/Ahd/2023 Ajramar Active Assort The Cit(Exemption) बनाम/ Trust Ahmedabad Vs. Sanand Circle S. G. Highway, Ahmedabad Gujarat - 382210 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaita5998F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Mehul Thakker, A.R. अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Kamlesh Makwana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 31/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 31/01/2024 O R D E R Per Ms. Madhumita Roy - Jm: The Instant Appeal Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 18.03.2023 Passed By The Cit(E) Ahmedabad, Under Section 80G(5) Of The Act.

Section 80G(5) of the Act. 2. The crux of the matter is this that the approval of the 80G has been disallowed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2 1 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2020-21

disallowed by the Assessing Officer. 9. We have heard the Ld. CIT-DR and the Ld. AR on this issue. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Gujarat State Financial Services Limited vs. DCIT, 174 taxmann.com 461 has held that under DCIT vs. HDB Financial Services Limited Page 5 of 6 Section 80G

TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

5 others A.Y.2013-14 43 account of benchmarking of loan to AE. Thus, the ground of the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed. Capital Infusion. 55. The TPO found that the assessee during the year has made payment of share application money to the following AEs: S. Name of AE Amount in Rs. Date of Date of share