THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. SHREE KHODAL DHAM TRUST, KAGWAD, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.904/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 D.C.I.T.(Exemptions) Shree Khodal Dham Trust, Circle-2, Vs. Kagwad, Ahmedabad. Alka Society, 4Th Floor, Shri Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near Water Tank, Rajkot-360004. Pan: Aajts1017J

disallowance of exemption u/s 11 of the Act, the same are taken up together for sake of convenience. The facts of the case as reflected in the assessment order as also made available in the Page 6 of 15 Asstt. Year 2014-15 course of the appellate proceedings are that the appellant trust came into existence vide trust deed dated

BARODA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for Asst

5 to 10 % of its value. He, therefore, prays for deletion of the\nexcessive unreasonable disallowance of Rs.6,46,875/- in respect of\nsale of seeds claimed u/s 80(P)(2)(iv) of the Act. On the contrary the\nLearned DR relied upon the order passed by the authorities below.\n==End of page 12 OCR==\nITA No.415

ATUL LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2017-18 Atul Limited Acit, Cir.1(1)(1) Atul House, Gi Patel Mark Vs Ahmedabad. Mithila Society, Ahmedabad. Pan : Aabca 2390 M (Applicant) (Responent) Assessee By : Shri Bandish Soparkar, Ar : Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 01/05/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 08/05/2025 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश

d): Disallowance under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D and addition to book profits under section 115JB 8. The assessee has challenged the action of the Assessing Officer and the DRP in making a disallowance of Rs.8,26,43,616/- under section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D(2)(iii), and further in increasing the book profits under section

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. AMBALAL SARABHI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, VADODARA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, VADODARA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. AMBALAL SARABHI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, VADODARA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

D E R PER BENCH The assessee and the revenue have both appealed (9 appeals) against the separate orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Vadodara [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] for different assessment years, i.e. 2002-03 to 2007-08 [hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”]. The issues in dispute pertain to various additions, disallowances made

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. SUZLON ENERGY LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result the Ground Nos

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

D” BENCH Before: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar, Accountant Member ITA Nos. 198 & 199/Ahd/2023 Asst. Year. 2016-17 & 2017-18 Suzlon Energy Ltd. The DCIT, 5, Shrimali Society, Circle-4(1)(1), Suzlon House, Nr. Vs Ahmedabad Shree Krishna Centre, Navrangpura Ahmedabad-380009, PAN: AADCS0472N ITA Nos. 302 & 303/Ahd/2023 Asst. Years

SUZLON ENERGY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result the Ground Nos

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

D” BENCH Before: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar, Accountant Member ITA Nos. 198 & 199/Ahd/2023 Asst. Year. 2016-17 & 2017-18 Suzlon Energy Ltd. The DCIT, 5, Shrimali Society, Circle-4(1)(1), Suzlon House, Nr. Vs Ahmedabad Shree Krishna Centre, Navrangpura Ahmedabad-380009, PAN: AADCS0472N ITA Nos. 302 & 303/Ahd/2023 Asst. Years

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. SUZLON ENERGY LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result the Ground Nos

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

D” BENCH Before: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar, Accountant Member ITA Nos. 198 & 199/Ahd/2023 Asst. Year. 2016-17 & 2017-18 Suzlon Energy Ltd. The DCIT, 5, Shrimali Society, Circle-4(1)(1), Suzlon House, Nr. Vs Ahmedabad Shree Krishna Centre, Navrangpura Ahmedabad-380009, PAN: AADCS0472N ITA Nos. 302 & 303/Ahd/2023 Asst. Years

SUZLON ENERGY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result the Ground Nos

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

D” BENCH Before: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, Judicial Member And Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar, Accountant Member ITA Nos. 198 & 199/Ahd/2023 Asst. Year. 2016-17 & 2017-18 Suzlon Energy Ltd. The DCIT, 5, Shrimali Society, Circle-4(1)(1), Suzlon House, Nr. Vs Ahmedabad Shree Krishna Centre, Navrangpura Ahmedabad-380009, PAN: AADCS0472N ITA Nos. 302 & 303/Ahd/2023 Asst. Years

THE VARDHMAN STAMPINGS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

17 of 2013),]\nshall not be deemed to be a speculative transaction.\nThe eligible transaction is defined as under:\nExplanation l.—For the purposes of clause (d), the expressions—\n(i) \"eligible transaction\" means any transaction, —\n(A) carried out electronically on screen-based systems through a stock broker\nor sub-broker or such other intermediary registered under section

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

17,71, 216/- under both general and MAT provisions. (4) The CIT(A) has erred in law and in facts in deleting the disallowance of depreciation of Rs.4,77,009/- claimed on shares despite the fact that shares are not depreciable assets. (5) The CIT(A) has erred in law and in facts in deleting the depreciation disallowance of Rs.68