THE NA vs. ARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,NAVSARIVS.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(E), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: 30.09.2022 As It Has Already Commenced 06.03.2004 Activities On 06-03-2022. 2. The Ld Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Has Erred In Facts & In Law In Rejecting The Application Under Section 80G (5) For The Reason That The Trust University Has Made Application For Final Registration Within The Validity Of Provisional Registration & That The Provisional Registration Is Valid Till Ay 2025-26. 3. On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case As Well As Law, The Ld. Cit(Exemption) Has Erred In Rejecting Assessee'S Application U/S 80G(5) Filed On 28.03.2023 On The Ground That Assessee Didn'T File The Application Before 30.09.2022 When The Assessee Has Filed The Application In Time As Per The Extension Granted Till 30.09.2023 As Per Circular No.6/2023 Dated 29-05-2023

condone delay in filing form No 10AB for approval under section 80G(5) of the Act 7. Appellant craves leave to add, alter on delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal” I.T.A No. 435/Ahd/2024 A.Y. N.A. Page No. 3 The Navsari Agricultural University vs. CIT (E) 3. The brief facts

BHURABHAI PUNJABHAI PARSANA FOUNDATION,RAJKOT, GUJARAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

TATAM SEVA SANSTHAN,BHAVNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMEPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

NANA AND RANDER SUNNI VOHRA MEDICAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION ) AHMEDABAD, AHMRDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

CLEAN TEETH CLEAN MOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

ADANI EDUCATION FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

condone the delay in filing application in Form No.10AB. The CBDT on multiple occasions had extended the time limit in filing the application in Form 10AB and vide Circular No. 6/2003 dated 25.05.2023, the date was not extended so far as filing of form 10AB under Section 80G(5)(iii

ADANI KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

condone the delay in filing application in Form No.10AB. The CBDT on multiple occasions had extended the time limit in filing the application in Form 10AB and vide Circular No. 6/2003 dated 25.05.2023, the date was not extended so far as filing of form 10AB under Section 80G(5)(iii

RABDI VIBHAG PROGRESSIVE KELAVNI MANDAL,VALSAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act. The Tribunal is a final fact finding authority, and based on the assessee`s facts and undue hardship created by the clause (iii) of 3rd proviso of section 80(5) of the Act, the Tribunal may condone

JAN AROGYA SEVA TRUST,VALSAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(E),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalिनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: - Jan Arogya Seva Trust Valsad, Vs. Commissioner Of Palihill 4, Bhagdawada, Income-Tax (Exemption), Valsad, Gujarat-396001 Ahmedabad Pan : Aactj 8121 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" "" यथ" "" यथ"/ (Respondent) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" यथ" Assessee By : Shri Rasesh Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Akhilendra Pratap Yadav, Cit-Dr तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2024 सुनवाई क" क" तारीख सुनवाई सुनवाई सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29.05.2024 घोषणा घोषणा घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Siddhartha Nautiyal: This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As "Cit(E)" For Short] Dated 12.08.2023, Rejecting The Application Of The Assessee Under Section 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act" For Short].

80G(5)(iii) of the Act to 30.09.2022. Since the assessee-Trust had filed application for grant of registration beyond the stipulated time, there is no error in the order of Ld. CIT(E) denying the grant of registration to the assessee-Trust. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. 7. In the instant

SAMADARSHAN TRUST,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

delay of 109 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant filed an application electronically in Form 10AB seeking approval under sub-clause (B) of clause (iv) of the first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The Commissioner (Exemptions) examined the application

SHREE SATSANGI SAKET DHAM RAM ASHRAM,MEHSANA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

condoned /ignored by the Ld. CIT(E) having regard to the eligibility of the assessee for such grant. In fact, that is the sole reason the Ld. A.R. is praying for remitting the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction upon him to treat the said application under Section 80G(5)(iii) instead of 80G

SHREE BIPIN BIHARIDAS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

condoned /ignored by the Ld. CIT(E) having regard to the eligibility of the assessee for such grant. In fact, that is the sole reason the Ld. A.R. is praying for remitting the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction upon him to treat the said application under Section 80G(5)(iii) instead of 80G

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEADABAD vs. THE CTI(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

condoned /ignored by the Ld. CIT(E) having regard to the eligibility of the assessee for such grant. In fact, that is the sole reason the Ld. A.R. is praying for remitting the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction upon him to treat the said application under Section 80G(5)(iii) instead of 80G

DAKSHIN GUJARAT SAMAST CHAUDHARI SAMAJ CHERITABLE TRUST FEDERATION,SURAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(Exemption) rejected these applications ex parte due to non-response to notices, and also cancelled earlier registration/approval.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned the delay

JITO BHAVNAGAR CHAPTER FOUNDATION,BHAVANAGAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

delay in filing application. 3. The appellant Craves liberty to add, amend, alter or modify all or any grounds of appeal before final appeal.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed application for final approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act in Form No. 10AB on Jito Bhavnagar Chapter Foundation

VISMRUTI SOCIAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee / applicant trust is allowed for\nstatistical purposes

condoned on due consideration of facts and owing\nto smallness of delay causing no perceptible prejudice to other side.\n4.\nThe brief facts of the case are that the assessee/applicant filed an\napplication for approval of trust under section 80G(5)(iii

DAKSHIN GUJARAT SAMAST CHAUDHARI SAMAJ CHERITABLE TRUST FEDERATION,SURAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter “the Act”], and further cancelled the assessee’s registration and approval granted earlier. Condonation of Delay

VIDYARTHI ASHRAM,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

condoning the delay of 87 days and admitting the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. 7. Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that his solitary contention against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(E) rejecting assessee’s application seeking approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act, was that the assessee had inadvertently mentioned the incorrect clause of Section 80G(5

THE GANDHINAGAR AYYAPA POOJA SAMITI,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

condoning the delay of 109 days and admitting the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. ITA No. 368/Ahd/2025 [The Gandhinagar Ayyapa Pooja Samiti vs. CIT(E)] - 5 – 7. Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that his solitary contention against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(E) rejecting assessee’s application seeking approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act, was that