THE NA vs. ARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,NAVSARIVS.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(E), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: 30.09.2022 As It Has Already Commenced 06.03.2004 Activities On 06-03-2022. 2. The Ld Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Has Erred In Facts & In Law In Rejecting The Application Under Section 80G (5) For The Reason That The Trust University Has Made Application For Final Registration Within The Validity Of Provisional Registration & That The Provisional Registration Is Valid Till Ay 2025-26. 3. On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case As Well As Law, The Ld. Cit(Exemption) Has Erred In Rejecting Assessee'S Application U/S 80G(5) Filed On 28.03.2023 On The Ground That Assessee Didn'T File The Application Before 30.09.2022 When The Assessee Has Filed The Application In Time As Per The Extension Granted Till 30.09.2023 As Per Circular No.6/2023 Dated 29-05-2023

section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act 1961 with appropriate direction 6. It is humbly prayed to condone delay

BHURABHAI PUNJABHAI PARSANA FOUNDATION,RAJKOT, GUJARAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

TATAM SEVA SANSTHAN,BHAVNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMEPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

CLEAN TEETH CLEAN MOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

NANA AND RANDER SUNNI VOHRA MEDICAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION ) AHMEDABAD, AHMRDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

delayed by almost about 2.5 months from the extended date. The Tribunal considered this issue and finally in para 6.1 noted and the relevant reads as under:- There is no dispute as to the fact that assessee is provisionally registered till A.Y. 2024-25 vide order dated 27.10.2021. Thus it has complied with section 80G(5). The proviso to this

ADANI EDUCATION FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

delay condonation under Section 119(2)(b) of I.T. Act, 1961. Therefore, the as per the CIT(E), the application in Form No. 10AB under Section 80G(5

ADANI KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

delay condonation under Section 119(2)(b) of I.T. Act, 1961. Therefore, the as per the CIT(E), the application in Form No. 10AB under Section 80G(5

RABDI VIBHAG PROGRESSIVE KELAVNI MANDAL,VALSAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act. The Tribunal is a final fact finding authority, and based on the assessee`s facts and undue hardship created by the clause (iii) of 3rd proviso of section 80(5) of the Act, the Tribunal may condone

SAMADARSHAN TRUST,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

section 80G(5)(ii) of the Act, and decide on merits. 4. The appellant craves liberty to add, alter, amend any ground of appeal.” 3. The assessee has filed an application seeking condonation of delay

JAN AROGYA SEVA TRUST,VALSAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(E),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalिनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: - Jan Arogya Seva Trust Valsad, Vs. Commissioner Of Palihill 4, Bhagdawada, Income-Tax (Exemption), Valsad, Gujarat-396001 Ahmedabad Pan : Aactj 8121 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" "" यथ" "" यथ"/ (Respondent) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" यथ" Assessee By : Shri Rasesh Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Akhilendra Pratap Yadav, Cit-Dr तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.05.2024 सुनवाई क" क" तारीख सुनवाई सुनवाई सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29.05.2024 घोषणा घोषणा घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Siddhartha Nautiyal: This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As "Cit(E)" For Short] Dated 12.08.2023, Rejecting The Application Of The Assessee Under Section 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act" For Short].

condone the delay in filing Form No. 10A/10AB, as the same could not be filed in such cases within the last extended date, i.e., 30.09.2023. 3. On consideration of the matter, with a view to avoid and mitigate genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 119 of the Act, hereby extends

VISMRUTI SOCIAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee / applicant trust is allowed for\nstatistical purposes

condoned on due consideration of facts and owing\nto smallness of delay causing no perceptible prejudice to other side.\n4.\nThe brief facts of the case are that the assessee/applicant filed an\napplication for approval of trust under section 80G(5

THE BARODA LAKKAD PITHA PUNCH PROPERTY BARODA,VADODARA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 80G(5) of the Act. Since both appeals arise from common facts and pertain to the same assessee and since the legal issues involved are interconnected, ITA No.1709 and 1710 /Ahd/2024 2 they were heard together and are being disposed of by way of this consolidated order. Condonation of delay

THE BARODA LAKKAD PITHA PUNCH PROPERTY BARODA,VADODARA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 80G(5) of the Act. Since both appeals arise from common facts and pertain to the same assessee and since the legal issues involved are interconnected, ITA No.1709 and 1710 /Ahd/2024 2 they were heard together and are being disposed of by way of this consolidated order. Condonation of delay

SHREE SATSANGI SAKET DHAM RAM ASHRAM,MEHSANA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

condoned /ignored by the Ld. CIT(E) having regard to the eligibility of the assessee for such grant. In fact, that is the sole reason the Ld. A.R. is praying for remitting the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction upon him to treat the said application under Section 80G(5)(iii) instead of 80G

SHREE BIPIN BIHARIDAS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

condoned /ignored by the Ld. CIT(E) having regard to the eligibility of the assessee for such grant. In fact, that is the sole reason the Ld. A.R. is praying for remitting the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction upon him to treat the said application under Section 80G(5)(iii) instead of 80G

SHREE LAXMINARAYAN EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEADABAD vs. THE CTI(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

condoned /ignored by the Ld. CIT(E) having regard to the eligibility of the assessee for such grant. In fact, that is the sole reason the Ld. A.R. is praying for remitting the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) with a direction upon him to treat the said application under Section 80G(5)(iii) instead of 80G

VIDYARTHI ASHRAM,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). 2. The Registry has noted delay in filing of the present appeal by 87 days. The assessee has filed an application seeking [Vidyarthi Ashram vs. CIT(E)] - 2 – condonation

THE GANDHINAGAR AYYAPA POOJA SAMITI,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). ITA No. 368/Ahd/2025 [The Gandhinagar Ayyapa Pooja Samiti vs. CIT(E)] - 2 – 2. The Registry has noted delay in filing of the present appeal by 109 days. The assessee has filed an application seeking condonation

AKSHAT EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,ANAND vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 80G(5)(iv)(B).\nITA No.456/Ahd/2025\nAkshat Education and Charitable Trust Vs. CIT(E)\n Assessment Year N.A\n2\nCondonation of Delay\n2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay in filing the present\nappeal. As per the Registry, the appeal has been filed with a delay of 119\ndays beyond the prescribed limitation period