Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(1)15 Section 10(108)10 Section 116 Addition to Income5 Section 246A4 Section 153A4 Section 158B4 Section 1324 Section 10

BHARATKUMAR SOMABHAI PATEL,BANASHKANTHA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, PALANPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed as in limine

ITA 389/AHD/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2007-08

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. D.R

Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)

section 5 of the Limitation Act, the Court should adopt a programmatic approach. A distinction be made between a case where the delay is inordinate and a case where the delay is of a few days. Whereas in the former case the consideration of prejudice to the other side will be a relevant factor so the case calls

KOSHAMBH CHARITABLE TRUST,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CPC, BAMGLORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

BHARATKUMAR SOMABHAI PATEL,BANASHKANTHA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, PALANPUR

KOSHAMBH CHARITABLE TRUST,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CPC, BAMGLORE

BHARATKUMAR SOMABHAI PATEL,BANASHKANTHA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, PALANPUR

KOSHAMBH CHARITABLE TRUST,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CPC, BAMGLORE

SHRI R V SHAH CHARITABLE TRUST,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE DY.DIT, CPC, BENGALURU CURRENT JURISDICTION THE ITO, EXEMP., BHAVNAGAR

SHREENATH DEVELOPERS,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)(5), VADODARA

JAYESHKUMAR TULSIDAS SUTARIA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD 7(2)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

JAYESHKUMAR TULSIDAS SUTARIA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD 7(2)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA