Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai53 Delhi40 Kolkata20 Bangalore11 Mumbai9 Pune8 Jaipur7 Lucknow6 Patna6 Hyderabad5 Amritsar5 Cuttack5 Ahmedabad4 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Orissa2 Dehradun1 Indore1 Himachal Pradesh1 Raipur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 69A4 Section 80I4 Section 143(3)3 Section 1443 Section 142(1)3 Section 2633 Exemption3 Addition to Income3 Section 144A2

GOMTIDAS GOVINDRAM SADHU,RAMJI MANDIR SHERTHA, GANDHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 GANDHINAGAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes with a direction as above

ITA 344/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad09 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No. 344/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Palak Pavagadhi, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr.DR

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 144ASection 250Section 69A

delay of 362 days is hereby condoned. Gomtidas Govindram Sadhu vs. ITO A.Y. 2017-18 3 Facts of the Case 5. The assessee is an individual engaged in performing religious duties as a priest of Ramji Mandir, Shertha. The assessee did not file a return of income for A.Y. 2017-18. Based on information received, the AO noticed that

GOMTIDAS GOVINDRAM SADHU,RAMJI MANDIR SHERTHA, GANDHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 GANDHINAGAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, GANDHINAGAR

GOMTIDAS GOVINDRAM SADHU,RAMJI MANDIR SHERTHA, GANDHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 GANDHINAGAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, GANDHINAGAR

RASNA PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, -3, AHMEDABAD

SHREE RADHA MADHAV GAU SEVA CHARITABLE TURST,BHAVNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), BHAVNAGAR

THE VENUS PARKLAND CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SERVICE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD