DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2 1 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2020-21

capital gains and this fact has not been controverted by the Revenue. The issue, as to whether any disallowance under Section 14A of the Act can be made in the absence of any exempt income, is no longer res integra. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court had held in the case of PCIT vs. Adani Wilmar Limited, DCIT

TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

5 others A.Y.2013-14 43 account of benchmarking of loan to AE. Thus, the ground of the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed. Capital Infusion. 55. The TPO found that the assessee during the year has made payment of share application money to the following AEs: S. Name of AE Amount in Rs. Date of Date of share

SHRI MANAV VIKAS FOUNDATION,CHAMARAJ, TL. VADHAVAN vs. ITO, WARD-2(EXEMP), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the asessee is allowed

80G of the Act, being engaged in the field of education and managing two schools for students from primary to higher secondary level. For the impugned assessment year i.e. A.Y. 2020-21, the assessee e-filed return of income on 13.02.2021, which was within the due date prescribed u/s.139(1) of the Act, declaring Nil income after claiming its entire