BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai280Delhi223Karnataka100Jaipur56Chennai52Pune36Calcutta34Ahmedabad32Kolkata29Chandigarh23Bangalore22Indore21Hyderabad20Allahabad19Guwahati17Visakhapatnam14Amritsar12Surat9Rajkot8Raipur5Cuttack5Agra3Lucknow3Nagpur2Cochin2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Addition to Income22Disallowance18Section 143(3)15Section 6813Section 13212Section 14811Section 69C7Section 133(6)7Section 69A7

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, BARODA vs. ULTRA TECH TRANSMISSION,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 393/AHD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Nov 2022AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

purchases may be disallowed, keeping into consideration the profit offered to tax by the assessee. During the year under consideration, the assessee had calculated NP at 16.09% of the Turnover. Accordingly, considering the observations made by the Ld. Assessing Officer in assessment order regarding the nature of sub-contracting expenses and looking into the totality of facts of the instant

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, BARODA vs. M/S. ULTRA TECH TRANSMISSION,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 396/AHD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

Search & Seizure7
Undisclosed Income7
Cash Deposit7
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

purchases may be disallowed, keeping into consideration the profit offered to tax by the assessee. During the year under consideration, the assessee had calculated NP at 16.09% of the Turnover. Accordingly, considering the observations made by the Ld. Assessing Officer in assessment order regarding the nature of sub-contracting expenses and looking into the totality of facts of the instant

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, BARODA vs. M/S. ULTRA TECH TRANSMISSION,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 395/AHD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Nov 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

purchases may be disallowed, keeping into consideration the profit offered to tax by the assessee. During the year under consideration, the assessee had calculated NP at 16.09% of the Turnover. Accordingly, considering the observations made by the Ld. Assessing Officer in assessment order regarding the nature of sub-contracting expenses and looking into the totality of facts of the instant

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, BARODA vs. M/S. ULTRA TECH TRANSMISSION,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 394/AHD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Nov 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

purchases may be disallowed, keeping into consideration the profit offered to tax by the assessee. During the year under consideration, the assessee had calculated NP at 16.09% of the Turnover. Accordingly, considering the observations made by the Ld. Assessing Officer in assessment order regarding the nature of sub-contracting expenses and looking into the totality of facts of the instant

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, BARODA vs. M/S. ULTRATECH TRANSMISSION PVT. LTD, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for assessment year 2016-17

ITA 1661/AHD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Nov 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

purchases may be disallowed, keeping into consideration the profit offered to tax by the assessee. During the year under consideration, the assessee had calculated NP at 16.09% of the Turnover. Accordingly, considering the observations made by the Ld. Assessing Officer in assessment order regarding the nature of sub-contracting expenses and looking into the totality of facts of the instant

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. REKHA INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 287/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

bogus and fabricated. The assessing officer also observed that cash sales were intentionally bifurcated into small amounts in order to keep the sale value below Rs. 2 lacs to avoid mentioning PAN of the cash purchaser. Therefore, in nutshell, the total purchases of Rs. 25,90,09,722/- recorded in the books of accounts during the demonetization period

REKHABEN INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 270/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

bogus and fabricated. The assessing officer also observed that cash sales were intentionally bifurcated into small amounts in order to keep the sale value below Rs. 2 lacs to avoid mentioning PAN of the cash purchaser. Therefore, in nutshell, the total purchases of Rs. 25,90,09,722/- recorded in the books of accounts during the demonetization period

RAMESHKUMAR MELAPCHAND SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1665/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

bogus which the AO failed to do so though he alleges that those purchases were not genuine. It amounts to only assumption by the AO against the facts on records gathered based on his own enquiries during the assessment proceedings. So, it is evident that purchase has happened during the period as mentioned by the AO and it is beyond

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. RAMESHKUMAR MELAPCHAND SHAH, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1618/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

bogus which the AO failed to do so though he alleges that those purchases were not genuine. It amounts to only assumption by the AO against the facts on records gathered based on his own enquiries during the assessment proceedings. So, it is evident that purchase has happened during the period as mentioned by the AO and it is beyond

GOLD FINCH JEWELLERY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1074/AHD/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: 01/08/2022
Section 131Section 133Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

bogus purchases made by various beneficiaries from Hawala dealers. Assessee was one of them. As per this information, he had made purchases worth Rs. 3.21 crores (rounded off) from such Hawala dealers during the financial year 2010-11. According to the Assessing Officer, this information 'needed deep verification'. ITA Nos. 1074/Ahd/2016 & 273/Ahd/2017 [Gold Finch Jewellery Ltd.] A.Ys

GOLD FINCH JEWELLERY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 273/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: 01/08/2022
Section 131Section 133Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

bogus purchases made by various beneficiaries from Hawala dealers. Assessee was one of them. As per this information, he had made purchases worth Rs. 3.21 crores (rounded off) from such Hawala dealers during the financial year 2010-11. According to the Assessing Officer, this information 'needed deep verification'. ITA Nos. 1074/Ahd/2016 & 273/Ahd/2017 [Gold Finch Jewellery Ltd.] A.Ys

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI MAHENDRAKUMAR LALJIBHAI PATEL, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 194/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri T.R.Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-D.R
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 68

bogus sales to convert his unaccounted cash at hand as cash sales made. Accordingly, the ld. A.O. treated the cash deposit during demonetization period as unaccounted credit u/s. 68 of the Act and added the sum of Rs. 2,17,41,000/- as income of the assessee and also taxed u/s. 115BBE of the Act and demanded tax thereon

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. CLARTECH ENGINEERS PVT LTD, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1841/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.1841/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Dcit Clartech Engineers Pvt.Ltd. बनाम/ Circle-1(1)(1) Plot No.413, V. Road, V/S. Ahmedabad – 380 015 Phase-Ii, Gidc Industrial Estate, Vatva Ahmedabad – 382 445 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aadcc 2311 A (अपीलाथ%/ Appellant) (&' यथ%/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divatia, AR &For Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)

270/-, making various additions, including the disallowance of depreciation on CNC Lathe and the addition of alleged bogus creditors. 3. The assessee preferred an appeal before CIT(A), who partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by restricting the depreciation on CNC Lathe Rs.1,28,975/- and deleting the addition of Rs.1,82,75,037/- on account of bogus creditors

THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VADODARA vs. PAWAN EDIFICE PVT. LTD., VADODARA

Appeals are partly allowed for\nstatistical reasons

ITA 529/AHD/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Aug 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: \nMs. Amrin Pathan, ARFor Respondent: \nShri Ashok Kumar Suthar, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 68Section 80G

bogus.\nIn line with the precedent relied upon, we hold that the ad hoc\ndisallowances for both years cannot be sustained, and the same are deleted.\nAs regards the Revenue's contention that the expenditure of Rs.78,82,000/-\nin A.Y. 2013–14 is capital in nature, we observe that these costs pertain to\nsite development and soil filling, which

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 116/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

270 CTR 66. This decision propounds that when the taxability of the assessee is going to be effected, then it can raise a fresh plea before the appellate authorities. Taking a leaf from this reasoning, ITAT, Mumbai and Bangalore have propounded that fresh claim can be made even before the DRP. Thus, respectfully following these decisions, we uphold that

GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 135/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

270 CTR 66. This decision propounds that when the taxability of the assessee is going to be effected, then it can raise a fresh plea before the appellate authorities. Taking a leaf from this reasoning, ITAT, Mumbai and Bangalore have propounded that fresh claim can be made even before the DRP. Thus, respectfully following these decisions, we uphold that

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 117/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

270 CTR 66. This decision propounds that when the taxability of the assessee is going to be effected, then it can raise a fresh plea before the appellate authorities. Taking a leaf from this reasoning, ITAT, Mumbai and Bangalore have propounded that fresh claim can be made even before the DRP. Thus, respectfully following these decisions, we uphold that

THA ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA vs. M/S. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 106/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

270 CTR 66. This decision propounds that when the taxability of the assessee is going to be effected, then it can raise a fresh plea before the appellate authorities. Taking a leaf from this reasoning, ITAT, Mumbai and Bangalore have propounded that fresh claim can be made even before the DRP. Thus, respectfully following these decisions, we uphold that

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2365/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

270 CTR 66. This decision propounds that when the taxability of the assessee is going to be effected, then it can raise a fresh plea before the appellate authorities. Taking a leaf from this reasoning, ITAT, Mumbai and Bangalore have propounded that fresh claim can be made even before the DRP. Thus, respectfully following these decisions, we uphold that

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA vs. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LTD.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2546/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

270 CTR 66. This decision propounds that when the taxability of the assessee is going to be effected, then it can raise a fresh plea before the appellate authorities. Taking a leaf from this reasoning, ITAT, Mumbai and Bangalore have propounded that fresh claim can be made even before the DRP. Thus, respectfully following these decisions, we uphold that