DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1) , AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC (1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHEMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1138 To 1146/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 To 2021-22) बनाम/ Prakash Misrimal Deputy Commissioner Of Sanghvi Income-Tax Vs. 17, Rajmugat Soc. Central Circle-1(1), Naranpura Char Rasta, Ahmedabad Naranpura, Ahmedabad 380013 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaeps7266A (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be initiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the Ld. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court had decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com 371). 10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

CHIRAG HIRALAL PATEL,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kambleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2697/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2020-2021 Chirag Hiralal Patel, The Income Tax Officer, बनामVs. Plot No.973/2, Ward-1, Sector 2C, Gandhinagar. Gandhinagar-382002. Pan: Avwpp9239K

151A of the Act. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in law by no considering the fact that the learned Assessing Officer erred both in law and on facts by failing to acknowledge that the statutory notice issued u/s.148 of the Act contained incorrect details, rendering it legally defective. 4. The learned CIT(A) erred in Law by not considering

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CC 1(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10. Per Contra, Shri A. P. Singh

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRAKASH MISRIMAL SANGHVI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

151A of the Act, the assessment was required to be\ninitiated and completed by the Faceless AO (FAO). However, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel fairly conceded that the Jurisdictional High Court\nhad decided this issue against the assessee and in favour of the\nRevenue in the case of Talati & Talati LLP (167 taxamnn.com\n371).\n10.\nPer Contra, Shri A. P. Singh