BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 67clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai409Mumbai335Delhi329Kolkata236Pune230Hyderabad192Bangalore174Ahmedabad150Karnataka130Jaipur119Chandigarh76Raipur65Indore45Amritsar41Surat39Calcutta39Cochin39Lucknow31Rajkot29Visakhapatnam26Nagpur23Cuttack20Guwahati19Kerala17Patna13Telangana11Dehradun10Varanasi9SC9Jodhpur9Jabalpur6Agra5Allahabad5Panaji3Ranchi3Orissa2Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 272A5Section 1544Section 143(1)4Section 903Section 1593TDS3

M/SWAHEGURU BUSINESS (P) LTD.,SARV NAGAR vs. DCIT-CC, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 46/AGR/2020[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Agra03 Feb 2021AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 272ASection 272A(1)(d)

67 TO 71 1. BECAUSE, 'appellant' denies its liability for being subjected to penalty under section 272A(l)(d)of the 'Act’. 2. BECAUSE, on the fact of the circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) heard in refusing to condoned the delay

ANKITA PALIWAL,ALIGARH, UTTAR PRADESH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 195/AGR/2024[AY 2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Agra06 Feb 2025

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234ASection 90

delay in filing form No. 67 was not condoned by the ld. CIT(Appeals) and, it was held by learned CIT(A) that the assessee cannot be granted foreign 3 | P a g e tax credit (FTC) . Thus, the appeal of the assessee stood dismissed by the ld. CIT(Appeals). 5. Still aggrieved, the assessee has filed appeal with

STATE BANK OF INDIA,GWALIOR vs. CIT A , GWALIOR

In the result, ITA No.42/Agr/2018 is allowed for statistical

ITA 6/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra31 May 2018AY 2013-14

67,81, 82, State Bank of AAACS8577K 69 City Center, BPLS11615C 83,84/Ag/2018 India, Branch- Gwalior A.Y.2013-14 kumbharaj. Guna ITO (TDS), 70- 89,71-74 State Bank of AAACS8577K 74 City Center, BPLS11636C /Ag/2018 India, Branch- Gwalior BPLS11718A A.Y.2013-14 Chanchoda, Guna Group of SBI and Ors. (TDS), 75- 88,87, 62 & State Bank of AAACS8577K 78 City Center, BPLS11686D 63/Ag/2018

STATE BANK OF INDIA,GWALIOR vs. CIT A, GWALIOR

In the result, ITA No.42/Agr/2018 is allowed for statistical

ITA 3/AGR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra31 May 2018AY 2013-14

67,81, 82, State Bank of AAACS8577K 69 City Center, BPLS11615C 83,84/Ag/2018 India, Branch- Gwalior A.Y.2013-14 kumbharaj. Guna ITO (TDS), 70- 89,71-74 State Bank of AAACS8577K 74 City Center, BPLS11636C /Ag/2018 India, Branch- Gwalior BPLS11718A A.Y.2013-14 Chanchoda, Guna Group of SBI and Ors. (TDS), 75- 88,87, 62 & State Bank of AAACS8577K 78 City Center, BPLS11686D 63/Ag/2018

MITHLA YADAV L/H OF LATE GYAN SINGH YADAV,GWALIOR vs. ITO 3(1), GWALIOR

Appeal stand dismissed in above terms

ITA 412/AGR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No. 412/Agr/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2011-12) Smt. Mithla Yadav Income-Tax Officer, बनाम/ (L/H Of Late Shri Gyan Singh Yadav) Ward 3(1), Gwalior. 67, Kaulonipura, Vs. Preetam Singh Ghas Mandi, Gwalior. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Afbpy-6128-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : None " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, - Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. The Appellant Herein Smt. Mithla Yadav Has Filed The Instant Appeal Against An Order Of Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Dated 21-06-2023 Confirming Assessment Order Dated 19-11-2018 As Passed By Ld. Ao Assessing Total Income Of Rs.107.01 Lacs. The Registry Has Noted Delay Of 31 Days In The Appeal Which Stand Condoned. 2. It Emerges During The Course Of Hearing By Revenue That The Appellant Smt. Mithla Yadav Has Claimed Herself To Be The Legal Representative Of The Deceased Late Shri Gyan Singh Yadav Who Is Stated To Have Left For His Heavenly Abode. The Ld. Sr. Dr Submits That Neither She Has Proved Herself As The Legal Representative As Per Section 2(29) Of Income Tax Act R.W.S 2(11) Of Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 Nor

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, - Ld. Sr. DR
Section 159Section 2(29)

67, Kaulonipura, Vs. Preetam Singh Ghas Mandi, Gwalior. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AFBPY-6128-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : None " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, - Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 21-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. The appellant