BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

50 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 11(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,510Delhi1,298Chennai809Bangalore664Karnataka533Ahmedabad517Pune513Jaipur320Kolkata286Hyderabad233Chandigarh153Cochin145Amritsar126Surat123Rajkot121Indore108Lucknow97Visakhapatnam87Cuttack82Raipur55Nagpur52Allahabad50Agra50Patna34Telangana33Jodhpur30Calcutta29Ranchi26SC20Panaji16Kerala13Guwahati13Varanasi12Dehradun12Rajasthan8Jabalpur7Punjab & Haryana7Orissa5Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 12A126Section 1165Section 14842Exemption34Section 14719Addition to Income18Section 143(1)17Section 148A15Section 12A(1)(ac)14

ACIT CIRCLE-4, AGRA vs. JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

ITA 355/AGR/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Agra13 Jan 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 12ASection 145(3)Section 2(15)

7,8,9 & 10, I have decided to examine both the provisions in the light of the Memorandum of Finance Bill, 2012 explaining these provisions and also certain recent judgments on these new provisions. In this regard, first both the provisions i.e. section 2(15) and section 13(8) are reproduced as under: - “Sec. 2(15)"charitable purpose"includes relief

JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JHANSI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4, AGRA

Showing 1–20 of 50 · Page 1 of 3

Section 2(15)13
Charitable Trust12
Deduction11

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

ITA 149/AGR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra13 Jan 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 12ASection 145(3)Section 2(15)

7,8,9 & 10, I have decided to examine both the provisions in the light of the Memorandum of Finance Bill, 2012 explaining these provisions and also certain recent judgments on these new provisions. In this regard, first both the provisions i.e. section 2(15) and section 13(8) are reproduced as under: - “Sec. 2(15)"charitable purpose"includes relief

JHASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JHANSI vs. DY. C.I.T., CIRCLE-4, AGRA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal

ITA 256/AGR/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Agra13 Jan 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meenajhansi Development Authority Vs..Dcit Circle-4, Commissionerycompus, Agra. Jhansi. (Now The Dy. Cit Panno.Aaalj0068K (Exemption) Ghaziabad. (Assessee) (Revenue) Acit, 4(1), Vs..Jhansi Development Agra. Authority (Now The Dy. Cit Commissionerycompus, Jhansi. (Exemption) Ghaziabad. Panno.Aaalj0068K (Revenue) (Assessee)

Section 12ASection 145(3)Section 2(15)

7,8,9 & 10, I have decided to examine both the provisions in the light of the Memorandum of Finance Bill, 2012 explaining these provisions and also certain recent judgments on these new provisions. In this regard, first both the provisions i.e. section 2(15) and section 13(8) are reproduced as under: - “Sec. 2(15)"charitable purpose"includes relief

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

ITA 224/AGR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2012-13
Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 250(6)

11 of the Act for the\nreason that the assessee trust was not registered as a charitable society\nu/s. 12AA of the Act. Several grounds of appeals were raised before us, but\nthe Id. Counsel stated that he wishes to make arguments with respect to\nground Nos. 6, 7 & 8, which were identically worded in all these appeals\nand read

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

ITA 220/AGR/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 250(6)

7. BECAUSE, the 'CIT(A)' had grossly erred in denying deduction, referring to section 119(2)(b) of the 'Act', under section 11 & 12 of the 'Act' which is available to the 'appellant' in view of revised proviso to sub- section (2) of section 12A as appellant was duly Registered under section 12AA w.e.f 01.04.2013. 8. BECAUSE, the proceeding before

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

ITA 222/AGR/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 250(6)

7. BECAUSE, the 'CIT(A)' had grossly erred in denying deduction, referring to section 119(2)(b) of the 'Act', under section 11 & 12 of the 'Act' which is available to the 'appellant' in view of revised proviso to sub- section (2) of section 12A as appellant was duly Registered under section 12AA w.e.f 01.04.2013. 8. BECAUSE, the proceeding before

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

ITA 223/AGR/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 250(6)

7. BECAUSE, the 'CIT(A)' had grossly erred in denying deduction, referring to section 119(2)(b) of the 'Act', under section 11 & 12 of the 'Act' which is available to the 'appellant' in view of revised proviso to sub- section (2) of section 12A as appellant was duly Registered under section 12AA w.e.f 01.04.2013. 8. BECAUSE, the proceeding before

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

ITA 219/AGR/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 250(6)

7. BECAUSE, the 'CIT(A)' had grossly erred in denying deduction, referring to section 119(2)(b) of the 'Act', under section 11 & 12 of the 'Act' which is available to the 'appellant' in view of revised proviso to sub- section (2) of section 12A as appellant was duly Registered under section 12AA w.e.f 01.04.2013. 8. BECAUSE, the proceeding before

SOMANI CHARITABLE TRUST,GWALIOR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, , GWALIOR

The appeals of the assessee stand allowed in above terms

ITA 221/AGR/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Apr 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: :Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 250(6)

7. BECAUSE, the 'CIT(A)' had grossly erred in denying deduction, referring to section 119(2)(b) of the 'Act', under section 11 & 12 of the 'Act' which is available to the 'appellant' in view of revised proviso to sub- section (2) of section 12A as appellant was duly Registered under section 12AA w.e.f 01.04.2013. 8. BECAUSE, the proceeding before

FIROZABAD SHIKOHABAD,FIROZABAD vs. C.I.T.-II, AGRA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 55/AGR/2015[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Feb 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: This Bench, Alongwith The Annexures Mentioned Therein. The Contents Thereof Are As Follows:

Section 12ASection 2(15)

7 444/A/2010. He submitted that the activities of the assessee authority, are prima facie in the nature of commerce or business or rendering service in relation to trade, commerce or business and, therefore, fall under the exclusion provided in first proviso to section 2(15), i.e. its activities are not for charitable purpose. If the activities of any assessee

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AGRA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, AGRA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 216/AGR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 May 2021AY 2011-12
Section 124Section 142Section 153

charitable is illegaland is against facts. The Ld.CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the appellant is enjoying registration u/s 12A of the I.T.Act and that the entire surplus shown in receipt & expenditure account was utilized in accordance with section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The return was also accompanying statutory report on Form 10B. Even the re-casted Profit

BUNDELKHAND GRAMOTTHAN EVAM SHAIKCHHIK VIKAS SAMITI,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD EXEMPTION, AGRA

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 497/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Agra05 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2021-22

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 250

7. Considered the rival submissions and the material placed on record. 8. I observe that the assessee had filed return of income on 19.02.2022 and also filed Form 10B on the same date, i.e., 19.02.2022. It is the fact on record that there is clerical error made by the auditor in Form-10B. However, the assessee has properly filed

OM DARSHAN TURST ,BAREILLY vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 349/AGR/2019[--]Status: DisposedITAT Agra22 Sept 2020

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar,And Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

11 Delhi reported in 175 ITD 729 had set aside and the C!T(E) was directed to grant approval to me assessee. The head notes of the said judgment read as under; "Section 80G, read with section 12AA, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 -Deductions - Donations to certain funds, charitable institutions - Assessee-trust was granted registration under section 12AA

SAMARPAN ANNAM DANAM CHARITABLE SOCIETY,GWALIOR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 186/AGR/2022[00]Status: DisposedITAT Agra11 Aug 2023
Section 12Section 12ASection 2(15)

7 Samarpan Annam Danam Charitable society Vs. CIT (E) whether the activities of the trust are genuine. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (for short, the ‘Tribunal’) reversed the orders of the Commissioner. The Revenue Department approached the High Court by way of filing an appeal. The High Court upheld the order of the Tribunal and came to the conclusion

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 112/AGR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Agra18 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 12ASection 80G

7 February, 2007 (Allahabad High Court) & St. Don Bosco Educational Society vs The CIT (Tribunal Lucknow) on 30 December, 2003: The Allahabad High Court held that the rejection of 12A/80G registration based solely on the balance sheet of a newly registered trust, where the trust had limited activities, was improper. The trust's objectives and its future potential to carry

KRISHNA BALRAM FOUNDATION ,MATHURA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurpose

ITA 113/AGR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Agra18 Jul 2025AY 2024-25
Section 12ASection 80G

charitable activities.\n•\nAkshaya Patra Foundation (2018) 401 ITR 330 (Karnataka\nHC):\nThe Karnataka High Court upheld that rejection of registration\nunder Section 12AA solely based on the balance sheet is not\njustified, especially when the trust is newly formed and has\nlimited financial transactions or activities in the early period.\nA trust's registration should not be denied just

KALPTARU VIKASH SAMITI,KOTESHWAR ROAD vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 557/AGR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 Mar 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI M. BALAGANESH, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 250

11 of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. 2 Kalptru Vikash Samiti 3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee is a charitable society duly registered under section 12AA of the Act vide order dated 19-12-2002 passed by Learned CIT Gwalior. Later the assessee

DR. GYANENDRA GOEL FOUNDATION,MATHURA vs. CIT EXMP., LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 173/AGR/2017[-]Status: DisposedITAT Agra07 Mar 2018

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

For Appellant: Shri Anurag Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajarshi Dwivedi, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

7. “Maa Bhagwati Samagra Utthan Trust vs. CIT” vide order (APB, 72- 75) dated 18.03.2011, in ITA No. 293/Agr/2009, holding that when benefit of exemption u/s 80G(5) of the Act by holding that the activities of the trust are not genuine. In “N.N. Desai Charitable Trust vs. CIT”, 246 ITR 452 (Guj), it 8. has held, interalia, that while

OMKAR MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY ,GWALIOR vs. CIT[EXEMPTION], BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 160/AGR/2024[00]Status: DisposedITAT Agra27 Feb 2025

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Omkar Memorial Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society, Bhopal Room No. 201, Ii Floor, Reac, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaa08054B Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Adv Revenue By: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/02/2025

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT DR
Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

Section 11(2) of the Act to be applied in future. The various receipts derived by the assessee in the form of dialysis receipts, xray receipts, interest receipts etc were applied for meeting out the charitable activities and all these facts are evidenced from audited balance sheet as well as income and expenditure account for the years ended

AASTITVA JAIN FAMILY TRUST,ASHOKNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 88/AGR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: : Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 164(1)Section 234Section 249(2)

Charitable and Religious Trust and also not Registered u/s12AA and 80G of the Income Tax Act but a Private Family Trust which is not liable for filing its Income Tax Return u/s139(4A) of the Income Tax Act. Moreover we are reproducing analysis of Sec 164(1) provided for Taxation of Private Discretionary Trusts: (a) When trust income includes