A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S SUNIL KUMAR MITTAL & MAMTA MITTAL, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

cash statements for the Assessment years 2005-06 to 2010-11 are attached as Annexure-"F". 10. On going through the reply of the assessee, it reveals that the asscssee AOP has been formed by Shri Ramesh Chand Garg, Chairman of the K S Oils Ltd.,Group, Morena to make investment in the shares of K S Oils Ltd. Shri

A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S SHYAM SUNDER & MANISH TAORI, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

cash statements for the Assessment years 2005-06 to 2010-11 are attached as Annexure-"F". 10. On going through the reply of the assessee, it reveals that the asscssee AOP has been formed by Shri Ramesh Chand Garg, Chairman of the K S Oils Ltd.,Group, Morena to make investment in the shares of K S Oils Ltd. Shri

A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-2, GWALIOR vs. M/S VANDANA JAIN & RAMA BANSAL, MORENA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

cash statements for the Assessment years 2005-06 to 2010-11 are attached as Annexure-"F". 10. On going through the reply of the assessee, it reveals that the asscssee AOP has been formed by Shri Ramesh Chand Garg, Chairman of the K S Oils Ltd.,Group, Morena to make investment in the shares of K S Oils Ltd. Shri

ITO 1(2), GWALIOR vs. SMT REENA AGRAWAL, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaassessment Year: 2012-13

gains arising on account of transfer of any long term capital asset. (ii). The assessee within the period of one year before had purchased a capital asset or (iii). The assessee within the period of two years from the date of transfer of the capital asset the assessee purchases new asset or (iv). Within a period of three years, after

RUBY JAIN,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1)(3), AGRA

In the result, the questions referred to us are answered as follows :

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshruby Jain, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 1/78A, Kale Ka Tall, Delhi Ward-1(1)(3), Gate, Agra Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aevpj4936P Assessee By : Shri K. K. Jain, Adv Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026

cash credit u/s 68 of the Act in the fact and circumstances of the instant case. The interconnected issue involved therein is as to whether the ld JCIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition of ₹50,645/- u/s 69C of the Act on Ruby Jain account of unexplained expenditure towards estimated commission @3% paid for seeking accommodation entries

SURESH CHANDRA SADH,NEW DELHI vs. CIRCLE 4(1)(1),, ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17]

unexplained cash credit Us Sec. 68 of the Act., therefore in view of the facts and in the circumstances, it may be held accordingly. 3 the AO is wholly unjustified in treating the Long-term Capital Gain

SMT ARCHANA DUTTA,MATHURA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3, MATHURA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Archana Dutta, Prop. M/S Vs..Acit,Circle-3, Dutta & Dutta Construction, Co., Mathura. 77E Dutta & Dutta Construction, Govind Nagar, Mathura. Panno.Afxpd7557B (Assessee) (Revenue)

gain, disallowance of Rs. 6,00,000/- on account of unexplained capital introduction and addition of Rs. 9,157/- under section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Apropos Ground Nos. 1 to 3, the AO has made this addition, observing as the following:- “The assessee created as situation where by the assessment u/s 144 to the best

SHRI SIYARAM YADAV,MAINPURI vs. ITO 2(5), MAINPURI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain

credit of accretion of saving from agriculture income and other income for Rs. 22,38,000/- when the A.O. has I.T.A No. 117/Agra/2017 3 himself accepted the source of income from agriculture at Rs. 2,97,620/- + 2,41,280/- other income totaling to Rs. 538900/- during the year. 11. That addition of capital gains tax made

NEETA AGARWAL,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 2(1)(2), AGRA, AGRA

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh(Through Virtual Hearing) Neeta Agarwal, Vs. Income Tax Officer, E-23, New Agra, Agra Ward-2(1)(2), Agra (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaxpa0936E Assessee By : Shri Amit Goyal, Adv Shri Nitin Goyal, Adv Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 16/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 04/12/2025

gain, in response to the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 30-03-2021. The reassessment ultimately stood completed by treating M/s Capital Trade Link Ltd as a penny stock and the sale proceeds of shares received by the Assessee in the sum of Rs. 95,20,372/- was treated as unexplained cash credit

GOVIND SHARMA,MATHURA vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(1), MATHURA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

unexplained cash credit vide assessment order dated 30.03.2022. 2. At the very outset, we notice that despite, appellant assessee having raised several grounds of appeal before the tribunal, an additional legal ground has also been raised through an application dated 14.01.2026, which reads as under: “That the assessment competed u/s. 147 r.w.s 144B of the IT Act in consequence

AJIT SINGH,SHIVPURI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GWALIOR

In the result, assessee’s appeal ITA No 263/Agr/2025 is allowed

capital gains, the very nature of the receipt as an advance for agricultural land sale places it outside the purview of taxable income in the hands of the Appellant, especially when the land belongs to his sons. 5.3 The PCIT's direction to the AO to potentially add this sum as unexplained money under Section

SHARAD MAHESHWARI,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), GWALIOR (M. P.), GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Sharad Maheshwari, Vs. Income Tax Officer, W-63, 3Rd Floor, Ward-3(2), Greater Kailash-2, Gwalior South Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Afepa7981H Assessee By : Shri Ashok Vijaywargiya, Ca Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2025

unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Act for not proving the creditworthiness of the donor. 5. With regard to gift received from Smt Manju Agarwal, sister of the assessee in the sum of Rs 6,25,000/-, the assessee submitted that the said amount was transferred by Smt Manju Agarwal out of her personal funds accumulated

MARSHAL SECURITY SERVICES,AGRA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA

In the result, the appeal is allowed

unexplained cash.\nContention of the Assessee: Rs. 100000/- was deposited on 04.11.2016 and\n400000/- was deposited on 08.11.2016 was outside the purview of\ndemonetization and by doing so AO exceeded the limit.\nHeld: Allowed the relief to that extent.\nConclusion:- ITAT did not permit AO to go beyond the direction despite the fact\nthat the entries of cash deposits reflected

MAYANK SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ITO 1(2), GWALIOR, GWALIOR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2014-15]

capital gains amounting to Rs.25,75,402/- and claimed it as exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act. The Assessing Officer on the basis of enquiries made by the Investigation Wing of Kolkata and as per the facts discussed in the assessment order held that the shares of Turbo Tech Engineering Ltd. was a penny stock and taxed the entire

ITO 1(1)(1)(5), AGRA vs. SHANTI CONSTRUCTIONS , AGRA

In the result, the appeal filed by revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaincome Tax Officer, Ward,1(1)(5), Vs.. M/S Shanti Constructions, Ug-13, Aayakar Bhawan, Agra Shanti Madhuvan Plaza, Delhi Gate, Agra (Appellant) (Pan: Aaufs3185N) (Respondent)

Gains of business and profession” shall be computed in accordance with either of mercantile system of accounting ‘regularly employed by the assessee’. It is only w.e.f. 1st April, 2015 that a change has been brought about in section 145(2) of the Act which permit the Central Govt. to notify in the official Gazette from time to time the income

MANISH MAHESHWARI,GWALIOR vs. JCIT RANGE-2, GWALIOR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Him Though Specific Request Was Made To Admit The Same. Ground No. 2 (I) Because The Ld. Cit(A) Has Wrongly, Illegally & Arbitrarily Confirmed Theaddition Of Rs. 67,530/- Made By The Assessing Officer U/S 40A(3) Of The Income Tax Act. (Ii) Because The Ld. Cit(A) Has Legally Erred In Rejecting The Appellant'Sspecificsubmissionand The Unavoidable Circumstances Under Which The Payment Wasmade. Ground No. 3 (I) Because The Ld. Cit(A) Has Wrongly, Illegally & Arbitrarily Confirmed An Addition Of Rs. 1,11,038/- Made By The Assessing Officer By Disallowing The Claim Of Interest Paid Holding The Same To Be Not Allowable U/S 57(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act.”

unexplained credit u/s 68 is held to be justified and the addition made by the A.O is hereby confirmed.” 5. The ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that the AO has made addition for want of copy of return of income and bank statement of the creditors in order to establish the genuineness and 4 creditworthiness of transaction

ACIT CIRCLE-2(1), GWALIOR vs. ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, GWALIOR

Appeal stand partly allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.16/Agr/2020 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta Acit - Circle-2 बनाम/ F-11, Harishankar Puram Gwalior Vs. Gwalior 474 002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Tan/Gir No. Aclpg-8972-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.23/Agr/2020 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit Circle-2 Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta बनाम/ Gwalior F-11, Harishankar Puram Vs. Gwalior 474 002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Tan/Gir No. Aclpg-8972-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Anurag Sinha (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain (Cit) – Ld. Cit-Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28-03-2025

credits; (v) Additions for purchase of land; (vi) Disallowance of expenditure. The same are adjudicated as under. 2. Addition of unaccounted payments and investments 2.1 From the assessment order, it could be seen that the assessee is associated with Pooja Guthka group of cases which was searched on 07- 10-2010. The assessee admitted income of Rs.516.07 Lacs. During

ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA,GWALIOR vs. ACIT, GWALIOR

Appeal stand partly allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.16/Agr/2020 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta Acit - Circle-2 बनाम/ F-11, Harishankar Puram Gwalior Vs. Gwalior 474 002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Tan/Gir No. Aclpg-8972-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) & 2. आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.23/Agr/2020 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Acit Circle-2 Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta बनाम/ Gwalior F-11, Harishankar Puram Vs. Gwalior 474 002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Tan/Gir No. Aclpg-8972-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Anurag Sinha (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Sukesh Kumar Jain (Cit) – Ld. Cit-Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28-03-2025

credits; (v) Additions for purchase of land; (vi) Disallowance of expenditure. The same are adjudicated as under. 2. Addition of unaccounted payments and investments 2.1 From the assessment order, it could be seen that the assessee is associated with Pooja Guthka group of cases which was searched on 07- 10-2010. The assessee admitted income of Rs.516.07 Lacs. During