MAYANK SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ITO 1(2), GWALIOR, GWALIOR

PDF
ITA 63/AGR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Agra01 April 2025AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member), SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee sold shares of Turbo Tech Engineering Ltd. and claimed long-term capital gains, which the Assessing Officer treated as unexplained cash credit. The CIT(A) decided the appeal ex-parte and confirmed the addition.

Held

The Tribunal noted that the assessee could not appear before the CIT(A). In the interest of justice, one more opportunity was given to the assessee.

Key Issues

Whether the CIT(A) decision made ex-parte was justified, and if the assessee should be given another opportunity to present their case.

Sections Cited

143(3), 10(38), 68, 115BE

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH ‘SMC’ AGRA

Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

Hearing: 01.04.2025Pronounced: 01.04.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH ‘SMC’ AGRA

(Through Physical/Virtual Hearing)

BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.63/Agr/2024 [Assessment Year: 2014-15]

Mayank Shivhare, Income Tax Officer, Shivhare Associates, Jinsi Ward-1(2), Nala No.1, Opp. Sudarshan Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Hotel, Gwalior, City Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh-474001 Madhya Pradesh-474011 PAN-AZVPS5145A Appellant Respondent

Appellant None Respondent Shri Shailender Srivastava, Sr. DR

Date of Hearing 01.04.2025 Date of Pronouncement 01.04.2025 ORDER PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex-parte

order dated 25.01.2024 of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, relating

to Assessment Year 2014-15 arising out of order u/s 143(3) of the Income

Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to ‘the Act’) dated 29.12.2016 passed

by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Gwalior.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the appeal is

being decided after hearing the ld. Sr. DR and on the basis of material

available on record.

3.

Brief facts of the case: In this case, the assessment was completed

u/s 143(3) of the Act. The assessee had filed ITR-4 showing salary income

2 ITA No.63/Agr/2024]

of Rs.1,65,000/- and income from business Rs.8,91,329/- and income

from other sources of Rs.1,24,685/-. The Assessing Officer noted that

during the year, the assessee had sold 15000 shares of the company

Turbo Tech Engineering Ltd. (scrip name Turbo Tech) and had declared

long term capital gains amounting to Rs.25,75,402/- and claimed it as

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act. The Assessing Officer on the basis of

enquiries made by the Investigation Wing of Kolkata and as per the facts

discussed in the assessment order held that the shares of Turbo Tech

Engineering Ltd. was a penny stock and taxed the entire receipts

amounting to Rs.26,14,250/- on sale of the said shares as unexplained

cash credit u/s 68 of the Act r.w.s 115BE of the Act.

4.

Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee filed an appeal before the

Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) decided the appeal ex-parte and confirmed the

addition made by the Assessing Officer.

5.

Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee is in appeal before us.

6.

The Ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below.

7.

We have heard the ld. DR and perused the materials available on

record. In this case, the assessee could not appear before the Ld. CIT(A).

Therefore, we are of the considered view that in the interest of justice, one

more opportunity be given to the assessee to represent its case effectively

before the ld. CIT(A). We, therefore, set-aside the order of the ld. CIT(A) and

restore the matter to his file to pass an order afresh after giving a

reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Further, the

assessee is also directed to appear before the ld. CIT(A). Accordingly,

3 ITA No.63/Agr/2024]

grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

8.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 1st April, 2025.

Sd/- Sd/- [SUNIL KUMAR SINGH] [BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 01.04.2025. f{x~{tÜ f{x~{tÜ f{x~{tÜ f{x~{tÜ Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. PCIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi,

MAYANK SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs ITO 1(2), GWALIOR, GWALIOR | BharatTax