BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,025Delhi417Jaipur211Kolkata185Ahmedabad140Chennai125Chandigarh90Bangalore75Indore72Hyderabad61Cochin58Pune56Rajkot53Raipur51Surat47Guwahati43Lucknow35Nagpur35Visakhapatnam25Amritsar25Jodhpur22Patna13Allahabad12Cuttack12Varanasi6Agra4Dehradun4Panaji1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 684Addition to Income4Section 2503Section 143(2)3Section 143(3)3Section 145(3)3Cash Deposit3Section 1472Section 1482Section 115B

DCIT , FIROZABAD vs. S.R. GLASS INDUSTRIES, FIROZABAD

Appeals stands partly allowed in above terms

ITA 93/AGR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 Feb 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: \nSh. Shailendra SrivastavaFor Respondent: \nSh. Pankaj Gargh, adv
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)

bogus Purchase of Soda ash from M/s Rama Shyama Papers\nPvt. Ltd.\nThai the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Agra\nbeing erroneous in law and on facts deserves to be set-aside and that of\nthe Assessing Officer deserves to be restored.\nThat the appellant craves leave to add or alter any or more ground

SAGAR DWELLINGS P LTD,NEAR SUN TEMPLE GWALIOR vs. ACIT, FACELESS

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 373/AGR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed
2
Unexplained Cash Credit2
ITAT Agra
16 Feb 2026
AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

set off of payment made for purchase of Goods at Rs. 1,03,89,106/- under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 rws 144B of income tax Act, and sustained by Ld. CIT (Appeals) is not tenable on facts and law. 9. BECAUSE, while making the assessment the 'AO' and while sustaining addition Ld. 'CIT(A)' made various observations/conclusions which

JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,AGRA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 454/AGR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Agra16 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

bogus sales. This action of the Ld. AO stood upheld by the Ld. CIT(A). The following points are undisputed and undisputable a. The assessee has shown cash sales as part of total sales disclosed by him in the sum of Rs. 7.07 Cr. in the profit and loss account. 5 | P a g e b. The purchases made

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, MORENA vs. SHRI AGRASEN LOGISTICS, JOTAI ROAD, PORSA,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 108/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Agra24 Jun 2025AY 2022-23
Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68

purchased the property\nbut could not sale during the year under consideration.\n2. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and specific issue relating to 'High liabilities\nin the form of 250 Loan creditors' was pointed out by Ld. AO which amounts to Rs. 17,02,25,505/-\n3. The assessee during the course of assessment proceedings filed