MANISH MAHESHWARI,GWALIOR vs. JCIT RANGE-2, GWALIOR
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 308/AGR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Agra26 Sept 2018AY 2010-11
Bench: Him Though Specific Request Was Made To Admit The Same. Ground No. 2 (I) Because The Ld. Cit(A) Has Wrongly, Illegally & Arbitrarily Confirmed Theaddition Of Rs. 67,530/- Made By The Assessing Officer U/S 40A(3) Of The Income Tax Act. (Ii) Because The Ld. Cit(A) Has Legally Erred In Rejecting The Appellant'Sspecificsubmissionand The Unavoidable Circumstances Under Which The Payment Wasmade. Ground No. 3 (I) Because The Ld. Cit(A) Has Wrongly, Illegally & Arbitrarily Confirmed An Addition Of Rs. 1,11,038/- Made By The Assessing Officer By Disallowing The Claim Of Interest Paid Holding The Same To Be Not Allowable U/S 57(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act.”
Section 133Section 40A(3)Section 57Section 68
2,00,000/- being the unsecured loan received from Kaushal Kishor Shrivastava. The credit confirmation and computation of total income was submitted during the course of Assessment proceedings. Copy of Income Tax return and copy of Bank statement were called from the depositor and due to non receipt in time
5
could not submitted during the assessment proceedings for which
