← All Phrases

“profit element”

DisallowancesSection 69CSection 69C5,654 judgments

The decision most relied on for profit element is CIT v. Simit P. Sheth (356 ITR 451), cited in 1,465 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on profit element

CIT v. Simit P. Sheth
356 ITR 451 · 2013 · High Court
1,465
citing judgments

Additions for alleged bogus purchases should be restricted to the profit element, not the entire turnover. The profit element is often estimated at 12.5% of the purported bogus purchases.

CIT v. President Industries
258 ITR 654 · 2002 · High Court
471
citing judgments

When books of account are rejected and unaccounted sales or receipts are discovered, the income addition is restricted to the net profit element embedded in these undisclosed transactions, not the entire sale proceeds or receipts, especially if corresponding purchases are not proven to be outside the books.

Sanjay Oilcake Industries v. CIT
316 ITR 274 · 2009 · High Court
460
citing judgments

In cases of alleged bogus or unverifiable purchases, rather than disallowing the entire purchase value, a reasonable profit element or a proportionate percentage of the purchases should be added back to the assessee's income.

CIT v. Siemens Aktiongesellschaft
310 ITR 320 · 2009 · High Court
259
citing judgments

Reimbursements of actual expenses without any profit element are not taxable income. Additionally, mere amendments to the Income-tax Act do not override the provisions of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs).

CIT v. Vijay M. Mistry Construction Ltd.
355 ITR 498 · 2013 · High Court
252
citing judgments

In cases of alleged bogus or hawala purchases where the existence of transactions is not entirely denied, only the profit element embedded in such purchases, and not the entire purchase price, can be added to the assessee's income. The focus is on determining a reasonable profit percentage for such additions.

CIT v. Balchand Ajit Kumar
263 ITR 610 · 2003 · High Court
212
citing judgments

When making an addition for unaccounted receipts, on-money, or non-genuine purchases/sales, the addition should be restricted to the estimated profit element embedded in such transactions, rather than the entire gross amount, particularly when evidence of corresponding expenditure is incomplete. This estimation often involves applying a net profit rate.

CIT v. Gurubachhan Singh J. Juneja
302 ITR 63 · 2008 · High Court
147
citing judgments

When unaccounted receipts or suppressed sales are detected and books of account are rejected under Section 145(3), additions to income must be restricted to the profit element embedded in such transactions, not the entire transaction value. This profit element is to be estimated by considering the assessee's regular profit ratio as per books of account.

PCIT v. Mohommad Haji Adam & Co.
103 Taxmann.com 459 · 2019 · High Court
146
citing judgments

Where purchases are found to be bogus, the profit element embedded in such purchases is to be brought to tax, not the entire purchase value. An addition for non-genuine purchases may be justified.

Judgments citing profit element

DCIT, Central Circle 1, Rajkot vs. R K Dreamland, Rajkot

ITA 564/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'bleGuj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed. For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. There for respectfully following the ratio

DCIT, Central Circle 1, Rajkot vs. R K Dreamland, Rajkot

ITA 563/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) M/S R K Dreamland Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'bleGuj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed. For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. There for respectfully following the ratio

R K Dreamland, Rajkot vs. DCIT, CC-1, Rajkot

ITA 560/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'bleGuj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed. For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. There for respectfully following the ratio

Rk Dreamland, Rajkot vs. ACIT, CC-1, Rajkot

ITA 556/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'bleGuj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed. For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. There for respectfully following the ratio

R K Dreamland, Rajkot vs. ACIT, CC-1, Rajkot, Rajokt

ITA 555/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 555 To 560/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2021-22 (Hybrid Hearing) Vs. The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 M/S R K Dreamland 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/. जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P आयकर अपील सं/. Ita No. 563 & 564/Rjt/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: 2016-17 To 2017-18 Vs. M/S R K Dreamland The Dcit, Cc-1 Aaykar Bhawan, Amruta Estate, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 204, Surya Arcade, Nr. Bank Of Baroda Main Branch, Mg Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) स्थायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aarfr4023P निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee By राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2026 Order Per, Bench: Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue, Pertaining To

For Respondent: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'bleGuj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed. For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. There for respectfully following the ratio

Buildfolio Realities LLP, Rajkot vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -1, Rajkot

ITA 510/RJT/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No. 509 & 510/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2021-22 & 2022-23 (Hybrid Hearing) Buildfolio Realities Llp The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Income Tax, Central-1 . Shop No. 5Gf, Business Edifice, Canal Road 37, Income Tax Office, Amruta Karanpura Corner, Rajkot Estate Building, Near Girnar Cinema, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360005 Rajkot-360001 "ायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aawfb8233C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'ble Guj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed.For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation. Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. Therefore, respectfully following the ratio laid

Buildfolio Realities LLP, Rajkot vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -1, Rajkot

ITA 509/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No. 509 & 510/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2021-22 & 2022-23 (Hybrid Hearing) Buildfolio Realities Llp The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Income Tax, Central-1 . Shop No. 5Gf, Business Edifice, Canal Road 37, Income Tax Office, Amruta Karanpura Corner, Rajkot Estate Building, Near Girnar Cinema, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360005 Rajkot-360001 "ायीलेखासं/.जीआइआरसं/.Pan/Gir No.: Aawfb8233C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147

Kesar Bhavani Developers Pvt. Ltd. in Tax Appeal no. 267 of 2022, the Hon'ble Guj. High Court has held that only profit element embedded in the gross on-money receipts can be taxed.For this, the Hon'ble court has derived reference from its earlier decision delivered in the case ... held that where evidences regarding unaccounted receipts are being assessed it is not reasonable to consider the entire unaccounted receipts for taxation. Rather, only profit element lying therein should be estimated keeping in mind the facts and surrounding circumstances of the case at hand. Therefore, respectfully following the ratio laid

Atul Kumar Garg, Ghaziabad vs. Ld. Assessing Officer, Faceless, Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5470/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumaratul Kumar Garg, Ld. Assessing Officer, B K Kapur & Co., Faceless, Delhi. 17, Navyug Market, Vs. Ghaziabad, 201001 Uttar Pradesh. Pan-Akzpk4529K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 11.03.2026 O R D E R Per Vimal Kumar, Jm: The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against Order Dated 04.07.2025 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Ld. Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’] Arising Out Of Assessment Order Dated 13.02.2024 Of The Assessment Unit Passed U/S 144B R.W.S 14B Of The Act For Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is Running The Wholesale & Retail Trade Of Ghee, Oil & Such Other Products Under The Sole Proprietorship Business Under The Trade Name (Sole Proprietorship) Of M/S Atul Trading Co. During The Year Atul Kumar Garg Vs. Assessing Officer

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 250Section 69C

entire alleged out of book purchases for Rs. 2,11,08,536/- which shall if any, only be restricted to the profit element in accordance to the law. 7. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the ground of appeal at the time