← All Phrases

“Section 273(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 273Section 273(2)2 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 273(2) is DCIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. (88 ITD 273), cited in 169 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 273(2)

DCIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.
88 ITD 273 · 2004 · ITAT
169
citing judgments

Interest, sales tax, and purchase tax subsidies received by an assessee are generally considered capital receipts, not revenue income, for income tax purposes.

Champion Engineering Works Ltd. v. CIT (1971) 81 ITR 273 (Bom), CIT v. Bowrisankara Stemp Ferry Co.
165 ITR 63 · 1987 · High Court
66
citing judgments

The case is cited for the principle that when a payment is made for a non-compete agreement which is part of a larger business transfer, the characterisation of the payment depends on whether it is for the enduring benefit of the business or for the loss of potential profits.

Addl. CIT v. Indian Pharmaceuticals
123 ITR 874 · 1980 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) cannot direct the Assessing Officer (AO) to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) in exercise of revisional power under Section 263 of the Act, if the AO had not initiated such proceedings in the assessment order.

123 ITR 874 (MP.), Addl. CIT v. Kantilal Jain
125 ITR 596 · 1980 · High Court
35
citing judgments

The Commissioner cannot direct the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) if the Assessing Officer did not initiate them in the assessment order, when exercising revisional powers under Section 263.

(supra), CIT v. Sudershan Talkies
201 ITR 289 · 1993 · High Court
35
citing judgments

Revisionary powers under section 263 cannot be invoked solely to direct the initiation of penalty proceedings.

CIT v. ParmanandM.Patel
278 ITR 3 · 2005 · High Court
32
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) cannot direct the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(a) or section 273(2)(c) while exercising powers under section 263, as the CIT himself is not empowered to record the satisfaction for such penalties.

1. Kuber Tobacco Products v. DCIT
117 ITD 273 · 2009 · ITAT
25
citing judgments

Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act, introduced by the Finance Act, 2008, has prospective effect and does not apply retrospectively.

Judgments citing Section 273(2)