← All Phrases

“Section 123(2)(a)”

Section References (mined)Section 123Section 123(2)(a)6 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 123(2)(a) is Capital Bus Service Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (123 ITR 404), cited in 91 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 123(2)(a)

Capital Bus Service Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
123 ITR 404 · 1980 · High Court
91
citing judgments

Depreciation under section 32 is allowable even if an asset is not actively used, provided it is kept in a condition of readiness or is put ready for use, as this amounts to passive user.

Govind Das v. ITO
103 ITR 123 · 1976 · Supreme Court
83
citing judgments

Taxing provisions imposing new liabilities or affecting substantive rights are presumed to operate prospectively unless the statute expressly or necessarily implies retrospective application. Retrospective operation is generally not given if it impairs existing rights, creates new obligations, or imposes new liabilities, except for procedural matters.

237(Kar); CIT v. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd.
123 Taxmann.com 38 · 2021 · High Court
43
citing judgments

Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D when the assessee possesses sufficient interest-free funds to cover investments that yield exempt income, even if mixed funds are utilized.

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Bihar
48 ITR 123 · 1963 · Supreme Court
43
citing judgments

An integrated business engaged in captive consumption derives profits or value from its internal activities, even when intermediate products are not sold externally. The principle that a person cannot make profits out of himself does not apply to deny profits from such internal operations for tax or cess purposes.

Addl. CIT v. Indian Pharmaceuticals
123 ITR 874 · 1980 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) cannot direct the Assessing Officer (AO) to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) in exercise of revisional power under Section 263 of the Act, if the AO had not initiated such proceedings in the assessment order.

Nalini Mahajan v. DIT
257 ITR 123 · 2002 · High Court
36
citing judgments

Failure to follow the prescribed procedure can invalidate an assessment. The definition of 'Assessing Officer' and the applicability of Section 143(2) to Chapter XIV-B proceedings are key considerations in assessment validity.

123 ITR 874 (MP.), Addl. CIT v. Kantilal Jain
125 ITR 596 · 1980 · High Court
35
citing judgments

The Commissioner cannot direct the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) if the Assessing Officer did not initiate them in the assessment order, when exercising revisional powers under Section 263.

PCIT- 7 v. Tally Solutions (P.) Ltd.) (
123 Taxmann.com 21 · 2021 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Amounts referred to under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are not deductible in computing income chargeable under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession'.

Judgments citing Section 123(2)(a)