“Section 13(7)”

Section References (mined)Section 13Section 13(7)4 judgments

GAGAN BHARTI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD EXEMPTION 1(2), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2275/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble Vice- & Mrs. Renu Jauhri, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Shivam Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR

Section 115BSection 13(7)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 2Section 250

r.w.s section 143(3A) vide order dated 23.02.2021 at an income of Rs. 8,42,40,301/- after invoking the provisions of section 13(7) r.w.s 115BBC of the Act. 3.1 Aggrieved, the assessee preferred the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). On account of non-compliance by the assessee

SHRI MAHAVEER CHARITABLE TRUST ,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO(EXEMPTION), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 181/ALLD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad14 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Subhash Malguria & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2013-14 Shri Mahaveer Charitable Trust, Vs Income Tax Officer 46, Rajendra Nagar, Baluaghat, (Exemption), Allahabad Allahabad-211003, U.P. Pan: Aahts9123K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Dr. Pawan Jaiswal & Sh. Ajit Kumar, Advocates Revenue By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2025 Date Of 14.10.2025 Pronouncement: O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit, Nfac Dated 28.09.2024, Wherein The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee That Was Filed Against The Orders Of The Income Tax Officer (Exemption), Allahabad Dated 30.03.2018. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under: - “1. Because The Impugned Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dated 28.09.2024 Affirming The Addition Of Rs. 1,97,69,650/- On Account Of Donation Received & Rejection Of The Submissions Of The Appellant That Appeal Proceedings Pending Against The Order Passed Under Section 143(3) Dated 30.03.2016 Are Infructuous Is Absolutely Illegal & Against The Principles Of Law. 2. Because The Hon'Ble Supreme Court In The Case Of Cit V. Alagendran Finance Ltd. [27.07.2007] Had Observed That When An Order Of Assessment Is Reopened, The Previous Assessment Will Be Held To Be Set Aside & The Whole Proceedings Would Start Afresh & In The Case In Hands The Assessment Order Dated 30.03.2016 Has Been Set-Aside By The Then Incumbent Ld. Cit(E); That Is To Say That No Assessment Existed On The Date When Order Dated 28.02.2018 Under Section 263 Of The Act Was Passed By The Then Incumbent Cit(E). 3. Because Section 263 Of The Act Grants Power To The Jurisdictional Commissioner To Direct For Revision Of Orders & Reads As Under (Relevant Statute Quoted):

For Appellant: Dr. Pawan Jaiswal & Sh. Ajit Kumar, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 263

erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue because the assessment had not been completed in accordance with the provisions of section 13(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Furthermore, the ld. CIT (Exemption) had been of the opinion that the AO had failed to make proper enquiries

NILAA CHARITABLE TRUST,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3126/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K (Vice President), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Mr. Sendamarai Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT

Section 11Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

trust, which is registered u/s 12AA and 80G, is anonymous in terms of Section 115BBC(3) r.w.s 13(7) of the Act. Sub section 13(7) read as under: “(7) Nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall operate so as to exclude from the total income

M/S GIAN SAGAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3801/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri M. Balaganeshm/S. Gian Sagar Educational Vs. Dcit & Charitable Trust, Central Circle-29, Sco 10-110, Sector 43B, New Delhi Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaatg5827B

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Pratap Mall, AdvFor Respondent: Md. Gayasuddin Ansari, CIT DR

Section 115Section 115BSection 133(6)

terms of complete names and addresses of the donors and purpose of donations then the AO is right in invoking provision of section 13(7) read with section 115BBC of the Act and the ld CIT(A) is also quite correct and justified in upholding the part addition made ... credited as income of the assessee. In my view these donation cannot be called anonymous donation therefore section 115 BBC read with section 13(7) are not applicable. In view of the above facts I agree with the arguments of Ld. AR that even in case of unexplained cash credit