← All Phrases

“deduction of export profits”

DeductionsSection 10A / 10B / 10AASection 10A / 10B / 10AA17 judgments

M/S GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT,, NEW DELHI

ITA 2539/DEL/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2005-06
Section 92C

though in terms of sub-section (1B) of section 80HHC, for the purpose of computing income under the normal provisions of the Act, deduction of export profits is restricted to the extent specified therein, the said restriction is, however, not applicable for the purpose of computing 'book profits'.\n\n33.1

GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 5358/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2006-07
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159,\n4791, 4856 &5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017\nGujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\nIN THE

GUJRAT GUARDIAN LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 4856/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2004-05
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159,\n4791, 4856 &5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017\nGujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\nIN THE

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 4791/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2004-05
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159,\n4791, 4856 &5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017\nGujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\nIN THE

GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 159/DEL/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2003-04
Section 92C

though in terms of sub-section (1B) of section 80HHC, for the purpose of computing income under the normal provisions of the Act, deduction of export profits is restricted to the extent specified therein, the said restriction is, however, not applicable for the purpose of computing 'book profits'.\n\n33.1

GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 158/DEL/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2002-03
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159,\n4791, 4856 &5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017\nGujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\n\nIN

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. GUJRAT GUARDIAN LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 157/DEL/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2003-04
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159,\n4791, 4856 &5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017\nGujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\n\nIN

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GUJRAT GUARDIAN LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 4859/DEL/2009[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2002-03
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159, 4791,4856 &5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017\nGujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\nIN THE

SHREE CHANDI MAA MAHAKALI PRACHIN MANDIR SIDH PEETH SAMITI,SONIPAT vs. CPC, BANGLORE

ITA 4791/DEL/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jan 2025AY 2022-23
Section 92C

{ "clean_text": "ITA Nos.4859/Del/2009; ITA Nos.157 to 159, 4791, 4856 & 5358/Del/2010 & ITA No.2539/Del/2017 Gujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi\nIN THE

JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, HARYANA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 4185/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

DCIT, HISAR vs. JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD., HISAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 4067/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, HISAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 2280/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

ACIT, HISAR vs. JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD., HISAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 2230/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD.,HARYANA vs. DCIT, HISAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 413/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

DCIT, HISAR vs. JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD., HISAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 341/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

ACIT, HISAR vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD., HISAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 220/DEL/2009[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits

JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED vs. ADDL. CIT,

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 167/DEL/2009[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 234BSection 80H

That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits ... That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the assessing officer erred in restricting the deduction of export profits allowable in terms of clause (iv) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB of the Act to the extent specified in section 80HHC even while computing ‘book profits