ITO EXEMPTION 2 4 MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. VAIBHAV MEDICAL AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is partly allowed
ITA 5494/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Feb 2025AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singhshri Sandeep Singh Karhailito (Exemption) – 2(4), Room No.609, 6Th Floor, Mtnl Building, Peddar Road, Mumbai – 400026 ……………. Appellant Maharashtra V/S Vaibhav Medical & Education Foundation, C-1, Aditya Birla Centre, S.K. Ahire Marg, Worli, ……………. Respondent Mumbai - 400030, Maharashtra Pan – Aaatv3207A
For Appellant: S/Shri Ronal Doshi a/w Deep ChouhanFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Heliwal, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(2)(a)Section 13(2)(b)Section 13(3)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 145Section 24
substantial contributors, then it loses the benefit of section 11 and its charitable character as provisions of Section 13(1) (c) read with Section 13(3) (b) are clearly invoked?
5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred ... Neerja
Biral by remitting on to the Trustees a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards settlement of the trust, as per the AO, under section 13(3)(b) of the Act, she is considered to be a person who has made a substantial contribution to the trust.
ITA No.5494