← All Phrases

“Section 124(1)(b)”

Section References (mined)Section 124Section 124(1)(b)11 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 124(1)(b) is CIT v. NHK Japan Broadcasting Corporation (305 ITR 137), cited in 96 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 124(1)(b)

CIT v. NHK Japan Broadcasting Corporation
305 ITR 137 · 2008 · High Court
96
citing judgments

When no specific statutory period of limitation exists, proceedings under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, particularly for payments to non-residents, must be initiated within a reasonable period of four years. This limitation also applies to consequential penalty proceedings under Section 271C.

CIT v. K. Ravindranathan Nair
295 ITR 228 · 2007 · Supreme Court
57
citing judgments

The computation of deduction under Section 80HHC requires applying the formula: Profits derived from exports = (Profits of the business x Export Turnover) / Total Turnover. For this calculation, miscellaneous income, sundry sales, and income from services, if not directly relatable to export activity, are generally to be excluded from "profits of the business" and "total turnover".

PCIT, Central-3 v. Allied Perfumers (P.) Ltd.
124 Taxmann.com 358 · 2021 · High Court
54
citing judgments

The case is cited for various issues including the definition of capital assets, reassessment procedures under sections 153A and 153C, and the effect of clarificatory amendments.

Bansilal B. Raisoni & Sons. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
101 Taxmann.com 20 · 2019 · High Court
46
citing judgments

The time limit for objecting to an Assessing Officer's territorial jurisdiction under Section 124(3) does not apply when an assessee claims the officer acted wholly without jurisdiction or outside the authority of law. Objections to jurisdiction not relating to territorial matters are not subject to these time limits.

ITA Nos.162, 164, 165, 167 & 168 of 2002 Page 24 of 51 in CIT v. SS Ahluwalia
138 ITR 391 · 1982 · High Court
34
citing judgments

An appellate tribunal ought to remand a matter rather than set aside assessments entirely when jurisdiction is in question.

M.V. Sonavala v. CIT
177 ITR 246 · 1989 · High Court
27
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer can determine the annual value of a property based on what it might reasonably be let for from year to year or its annual ratable value, especially when rent is not charged or is below market rates. This approach is permissible under Section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act.

Mega Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT
155 ITD 1019 · 2015 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

An assessment order passed without a valid order of transfer under Section 120(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is void and without jurisdiction.

M/s Tata Sons Limited v. Hon'ble Bombay ITAT
76 Taxmann.com 126 · 2016 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

An Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) can perform the functions and exercise the powers of an Assessing Officer only if specifically directed under section 120(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act.

Judgments citing Section 124(1)(b)