← All Phrases

“Section 38(2)”

Section References (mined)Section 38Section 38(2)35 judgments

ACIT , MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE POWER LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 3989/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

business shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable under the head\n“Profits and Gains of business or profession”. Similarly, as per section 38(2) of\nthe Act, Building, etc., partly used for business, etc., or not exclusively so used,\ndeductions u/s.30 to 32 can be restricted

JAYARAM REDDY BOOPESH REDDY,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BENGALURU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 711/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Chodhry & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Bharat, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shivanad Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

held that in cases where cars are used partly for business and partly for non-business purposes, full depreciation cannot be allowed under section 38(2) of the Act. 9.7 The learned CIT(A) also rejected the argument regarding block of assets, holding that user test under section ... Revenue to take a different stand now. He argued that in the absence of any evidence showing personal use, the provisions of section 38(2) relating to mixed use did not apply. Since the assessee had shown exclusive business use, the disallowance could not be sustained. . ITA No.705 - 711/Bang/2025 Page

MAXXIS RUBBER INDIA PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1129/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 32Section 32(1)

days 15 Total depreciation 5,29,41,01,183 - 11,07,99,883 (10+11+12+13+14) 16 Depreciation disallowed under - - section 38(2) of the I.T. Act (out of column 15) 17 Net aggregate depreciation (15- 5,29,41,01,183 - 11,07,99,883 16) 18 Proportionate ... year on asset put to use for less than 180 days 15. Total depreciation (10+11+12+13+14) 16. Depreciation disallowed under section 38(2) of the I.T. Act (out of column 15) 7.4 Even on going through the above, it can be found that no mechanism

SHREE RAJENDRA SURI SAH SAKH SANTHA MYD,RAJGARH, DHAR vs. THE ITO, DHAR, DHAR

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 786/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 253Section 37Section 38(2)Section 80P

account of ad-hoc disallowance of 25 percent of depreciation expenses of Rs.11,97,909/- claimed in the Profit and Loss account under section 38(2) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 in view of leakage and personal utilization of vehicle without properly appreciating the facts of the case

SUZUKI MOTOR GUJARAT PVT LTD,AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDANAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 998/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263

days Total depreciation - 15 5,29,41,01,183 11,07,99,883 (10+11+12+13+14) Depreciation disallowed under 16 section 38(2) of the I.T. Act (out of - - - column 15) - 17 5,29,41,01,183 11,07,99,883 Net aggregate depreciation (15- 16) Proportionate aggregate ... year on asset put to use for less than 180 days 15. Total depreciation (10+11+12+13+14) 16. Depreciation disallowed under section 38(2) of the I.T. Act (out of column 15) Suzuki Motor Gujarat Pvt Ltd Vs. PCIT Asst. Year : 2018-19 - 9– 7.4 Even on going

RAM RATAN JANGIR,AMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -7(2), JAIPUR

In the result ground no. 1 raised by the

ITA 550/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anoop Bhatiya, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl. CIT)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

having regard to the user of such building, machinery, plant or furniture for the purposes of the business or profession." Thus the aforesaid section 38(2) under which disallowance can be made refers to deduction available section 32(1) (ii) only for making the proportionate disallowance. Now section

DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 5(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for assessment year

ITA 3019/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Mar 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

For Appellant: Mr. Firoze B. AndhyarujinaFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR

disallowed under the head ‘profit and is also liable to be disallowed under the head ‘profit and gains of business’. The business’. The section 38(2) of the Act provide that where section 38(2) of the Act provide that where any building, machinery plant or furniture hinery plant

DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 5(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for assessment year

ITA 3018/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Mar 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail ()

For Appellant: Mr. Firoze B. AndhyarujinaFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR

disallowed under the head ‘profit and is also liable to be disallowed under the head ‘profit and gains of business’. The business’. The section 38(2) of the Act provide that where section 38(2) of the Act provide that where any building, machinery plant or furniture hinery plant

DCIT-6(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. AASAN CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2710/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhaasan Corporate Vs. Dcit, Circle 6(1)(1) Solutions Private Limited 563B, 5Th Floor, 4Th Floor, Piramal Tower Aayakar Bhavan, Annexe, Ganpatrao Kadam Maharishi Karve Road, Marg Lower, Parel Mumbai - 400020 Mumbai – 400013 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aajca7980P Appellant .. Respondent Dcit, Circle 6(1)(1) Vs. M/S Aasan Corporate Room No. 504, 5 Th Floor, Solutions Private Limited Araykar Bhavan 4Th Floor, Piramal Tower M.K. Road, Annexe, Ganpatrao Mumbai – 400 020 Kadam Marg Lower, Parel Mumbai – 400013 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aajca7980P Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Ronak Doshi A/W Priyank Gandhi Respondent By : Ajay Chandra Date Of Hearing 21.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 05.01.2024

For Appellant: Ronak doshi a/wFor Respondent: Ajay Chandra
Section 14ASection 23(1)(a)Section 40

P a g e | 1 ITA No.1968 & 2710/Mum/2023 Aasan Corporate Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 6(1)(1) IN

AASAN CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 6(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1968/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2024AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: \nRonak doshi a/wFor Respondent: \nAjay Chandra
Section 14ASection 23(1)(a)Section 40

{ "clean_text": "Page 1\nITA No. 1968 & 2710/Mum/2023\nAasan Corporate Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 6(1)(1)\nIN

DCIT RG 8(2), MUMBAI vs. PROCTOR & GAMBLE HYGIENE & HEALTH CARE LTD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2446/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.3518 & 2277/Mum/2012 Procter & Gamble Hygiene Vs. Additional Cit Circle 8(2) & Healthcare Limited Mumbai -400020 P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400009 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacp6332M Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Yogesh Thar, Ms. SukanyaFor Respondent: Tushar Mohite
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

PROCTER & GAMBLE HYGINE & HEALTH CARE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT CIR 8(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1735/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.3518 & 2277/Mum/2012 Procter & Gamble Hygiene Vs. Additional Cit Circle 8(2) & Healthcare Limited Mumbai -400020 P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400009 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacp6332M Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Yogesh Thar, Ms. SukanyaFor Respondent: Tushar Mohite
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

ADDL CIT RG 8(2), MUMBAI vs. PROCTOR & GAMBLE HYGINENE & HEALTH CARE LTD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 3566/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.3518 & 2277/Mum/2012 Procter & Gamble Hygiene Vs. Additional Cit Circle 8(2) & Healthcare Limited Mumbai -400020 P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400009 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacp6332M Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Yogesh Thar, Ms. SukanyaFor Respondent: Tushar Mohite
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

PROCTER & GAMBLE HYGIENE & HEALTH CARE LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT CIR 8(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 3518/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.3518 & 2277/Mum/2012 Procter & Gamble Hygiene Vs. Additional Cit Circle 8(2) & Healthcare Limited Mumbai -400020 P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400009 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacp6332M Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Yogesh Thar, Ms. SukanyaFor Respondent: Tushar Mohite
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

PROCTER & GAMBLE HYGIENE & HEALTH CARE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.C.I.T. CIR. 8(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2277/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.3518 & 2277/Mum/2012 Procter & Gamble Hygiene Vs. Additional Cit Circle 8(2) & Healthcare Limited Mumbai -400020 P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400009 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacp6332M Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Yogesh Thar, Ms. SukanyaFor Respondent: Tushar Mohite
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

ADDL CIT RG 8(2), MUMBAI vs. PROCTOR & GAMBLE HYGIENE & HEALTH CARE LTD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2167/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Dec 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amarjit Singhita No.3518 & 2277/Mum/2012 Procter & Gamble Hygiene Vs. Additional Cit Circle 8(2) & Healthcare Limited Mumbai -400020 P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400009 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaacp6332M Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Yogesh Thar, Ms. SukanyaFor Respondent: Tushar Mohite
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA LABOUR WELFARE BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and Cross objections of the assessee are allowed

ITA 138/MUM/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyal & Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (E)-2(1) Mumbai ...... Appellant Vs. Maharashtra Labour Welfare Board Girni Kamgar Kareeda Bhavan, Elphinston Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai – 400 013 Pan: Aaaam3255A ..... Respondent

For Respondent: Shri Vipul Joshi & Shri Ashok Patil, Ld.AR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 20Section 250Section 4

state and Central Government on the other Take, for instance, the case of suppression of the corporation authorized by section 38. Section 38(2)(c) emphatically brings out the fact that the property really vests in the corporation, because it provides that during the period of suppression, it shall vest

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA LABOUR WELFARE BOARD GIRNI KAMGAR, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and Cross objections of the assessee are allowed

ITA 137/MUM/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyal & Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (E)-2(1) Mumbai ...... Appellant Vs. Maharashtra Labour Welfare Board Girni Kamgar Kareeda Bhavan, Elphinston Senapati Bapat Marg Mumbai – 400 013 Pan: Aaaam3255A ..... Respondent

For Respondent: Shri Vipul Joshi & Shri Ashok Patil, Ld.AR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 20Section 250Section 4

state and Central Government on the other Take, for instance, the case of suppression of the corporation authorized by section 38. Section 38(2)(c) emphatically brings out the fact that the property really vests in the corporation, because it provides that during the period of suppression, it shall vest

PROCTER & GAMGLE HYGIENE& HEALTHCARE ,LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR 7(1), MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 6591/MUM/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2023AY 2004-05
For Appellant: Shri Yogesh TharFor Respondent: Shri Gaurav Batham
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

ADDL CIT RG 7(1), MUMBAI vs. PROCTOR & GAMBLE HYGIENE & HEALTHCARE LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 6549/MUM/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2023AY 2004-05
For Appellant: Shri Yogesh TharFor Respondent: Shri Gaurav Batham
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

2) An Asset not exclusively used for the purposes of the business or profession but used other than business purposes as provided in section 38(2) of the Act. (3) where any block of assets does not cease to exist but the full value of the consideration received or accruing

Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2