← All Phrases

“Section 167(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 167Section 167(1)9 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 167(1) is Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Hemla Embroidery Mills P. Ltd. (366 ITR 167), cited in 400 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 167(1)

Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Hemla Embroidery Mills P. Ltd.
366 ITR 167 · 2014 · High Court
400
citing judgments

Employee contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and Employee State Insurance (ESI) are deductible under the Income Tax Act if deposited by the assessee before the due date for filing the return of income, even if such deposits are made after the specific due dates prescribed under the respective PF and ESI Acts.

Challapalli Sugars Ltd. v. CIT
98 ITR 167 · 1975 · Supreme Court
185
citing judgments

Interest on borrowed capital utilized for acquiring a capital asset is capitalized until business commences. Once business is set up, this interest is deductible under section 36(1)(iii) even if the asset has not yet been put to use, accepting commercial accounting standards in the absence of contrary statutory provisions.

Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Anr. v. Ms Katiji and Others
167 ITR 5 · 1987 · Supreme Court
164
citing judgments

The principle of 'sufficient cause' for condonation of delay in filing appeals requires a liberal interpretation to ensure substantial justice, but delay will not be condoned if sufficient cause is not satisfactorily explained by the appellant.

PCIT v. Caraf Builders & Construction (P) Ltd.
101 Taxmann.com 167 · 2019 · High Court
101
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenditure under section 14A of the Income-tax Act cannot exceed the amount of exempt income earned by the assessee in the relevant assessment year.

S.S.I Ltd. v. DCIT
293 ITR 146 · 2007 · Reported
63
citing judgments

The estimation of income for deducting tax at source under Section 192(1) of the Income-tax Act is valid when based on an honest and fair assessment by the assessee, a principle affirmed by the Supreme Court.

ITA Nos.162, 164, 165, 167 & 168 of 2002 Page 24 of 51 in CIT v. SS Ahluwalia
138 ITR 391 · 1982 · High Court
34
citing judgments

An appellate tribunal ought to remand a matter rather than set aside assessments entirely when jurisdiction is in question.

DCIT v. SEW Infrastructure Ltd.
167 Taxmann.com 446 · 2024 · ITAT
19
citing judgments

When an assessment is abated under section 153A, an assessee is entitled to claim deductions or exemptions in the return filed in response to the notice. The ITAT Special Bench has held that a deduction under section 80-IA is permissible in such a scenario.

Amarjothi Pictures v. CIT
69 ITR 755 · 1968 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The revenue cannot question the commercial expediency of an expenditure if it is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. The assessee's judgment on what constitutes reasonable business expenditure is generally respected.

Judgments citing Section 167(1)

Vindhya Trust, New Delhi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 131/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jul 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanvindhya Trust, Vs. Dcit, Circle 49 (1), B – 60/61, C/O Bajaj Auto Limited, Delhi. Naraina Industrial Estate, Delhi – 110 028. (Pan : Aaatv0303K) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Mahender Gohel, Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramesh Chand, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.05.2025 Date Of Order : 23.07.2025 O R D E R Per S.Rifaur Rahman: 1. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Addl/Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) – 3, Hyderabad [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Jcit (A)] Dated 12.11.2024 For Assessment Year 2021-22 Raising Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “Ground 1 - Rate Of Tax: The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)] Has Erred In Upholding Levy Of Tax At Flat Rate Of30%, Instead Of Normal Slab Rates Applicable In The Case Of The Appellant. The Learned Cit(A) & The Learned Assessing Officer Failed To Appreciate That The Appellant Is An Association Of Persons (Aop)/Charitable Trust Not Claiming Benefits Of Section 11 Of The Act & Is Liable To Pay Tax At The Slab Rates Applicable In The Case Of An Individual, Etc. The Appellant Prays That The Learned Assessing Officer Be Directed To Re-Compute

For Appellant: Shri Mahender Gohel, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ramesh Chand, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 143(1)Section 167BSection 234BSection 234C

record and allowed the same by relying on the CBDT circular. For the sake of brevity, the same is reproduced below :- “7.2.5. Section 167(1) of the Act, makes it very clear that this section would not apply to the company or a co-operative society or a society registered