← All Phrases

“specified authority”

ReassessmentSection 151Section 1511,163 judgments

JAVITRI DEVI,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 30(5), DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 6619/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Kumara.Yr. : 2016-17 Javitri Devi, Vs. Income Tax Officer, R-7, Nehru Enclave, Ward 30(5), Kalkaji New Delhi New Delhi – 110 019 (Pan: Aafpd2491M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. S.C. Garg, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR
Section 13Section 148Section 148ASection 151

that the Notice dated 29.07.2022 issued u/s 148 of the Act is not a valid notice, as the approval was not granted by the specified authority i.e. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax as mandated u/s 151(ii) We further observe that the impugned notice

BMR OVERSEAS LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4(2), C.R. BUILDING DELHI 110002, DELHI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6646/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman & Sh. Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2017-18 Bmr Overseas Limited, Vs. Dcit, Circle 4(2), Zb-33/487, Plot No. 4 & 5, C.R. Building, Dilshad Garde New Delhi Industrial Area, Shahdara, Delhi – 110 095 [Pan No. Aafcb8509D) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 115BSection 143Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 156Section 157ASection 68

fall out of its own decision in the case of Ashish Agarwal (supra) had dealt with the issue in respect of sanction of the specified authority and concluded that TOLA will extend the time limit for the grant of sanction by the authority specified u/s.151. According ... regime is that if the time limit of three years from the end of the Assessment Year falls between 20.03.2020 and 31.03.2021 then, the specified authority u/s.151(i) has extended time till 30.06.2021 to grant the approval. According to the Hon'ble Court, Assessing Officers were required to issue

PAWAN KUMAR CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI vs. ITO, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as above

ITA 687/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 685, 686 & 687/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward Dhamtari, Gandhi Chowk, Kurud, Shankardan Road, Village:Haraftarai, Dhamtari-493663, Chhattisgarh. Dhamtari-493773, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aqdpc2033J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Veekas S Sharma, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Veekas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 2(14)(iii)Section 250

assessment order is illegal, bad in law, and void ab initio, as the Learned AO failed to annex the prior approval of the specified authority along with the notice issued u/s 148 which is in gross violation of CBDT Guidelines No. F.No.299/10/2022-Dir(Inv.III)/611 dated 01.08.2022, particularly Para

PAWAN KUMAR CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI vs. ITO, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as above

ITA 686/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 685, 686 & 687/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward Dhamtari, Gandhi Chowk, Kurud, Shankardan Road, Village:Haraftarai, Dhamtari-493663, Chhattisgarh. Dhamtari-493773, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aqdpc2033J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Veekas S Sharma, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Veekas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 2(14)(iii)Section 250

assessment order is illegal, bad in law, and void ab initio, as the Learned AO failed to annex the prior approval of the specified authority along with the notice issued u/s 148 which is in gross violation of CBDT Guidelines No. F.No.299/10/2022-Dir(Inv.III)/611 dated 01.08.2022, particularly Para

PAWAN KUMAR CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI vs. ITO,WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as above

ITA 685/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 685, 686 & 687/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward Dhamtari, Gandhi Chowk, Kurud, Shankardan Road, Village:Haraftarai, Dhamtari-493663, Chhattisgarh. Dhamtari-493773, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aqdpc2033J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Veekas S Sharma, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Veekas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 2(14)(iii)Section 250

assessment order is illegal, bad in law, and void ab initio, as the Learned AO failed to annex the prior approval of the specified authority along with the notice issued u/s 148 which is in gross violation of CBDT Guidelines No. F.No.299/10/2022-Dir(Inv.III)/611 dated 01.08.2022, particularly Para

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT LTD,RAJOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 787/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

well as\nreply of the assessee submitted in response to notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 786/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

well as\nreply of the assessee submitted in response to notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued

SIX TWENTY REALTY PVT. LTD.,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 785/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

Page 3 of 28 ITA Nos. 785 to 787 & 765/Rjt/2024 Six Twenty Realty Pvt. Ltd. after obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of the Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was issued and served upon

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SIX TWENTY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED, RAJKOT

ITA 765/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

well as\nreply of the assessee submitted in response to notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act and\nafter obtaining necessary approval of the specified authority as defined u/s 151 of\nthe Act. Notice u/s 148 of the Act along with order u/ s148A(d) of the Act was\nissued

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. R K DREAMLAND, RAJKOT

ITA 564/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, राजकोट न्यायपीठ, राजकोट।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT\nBEFORE DR. ARJUN

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. R K DREAMLAND, RAJKOT

ITA 563/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, राजकोट न्यायपीठ, राजकोट।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH,\nRAJKOT\nBEFORE DR. ARJUN

R K DREAMLAND,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 560/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, राजकोट न्यायपीठ, राजकोट।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT\nBEFORE DR. ARJUN

R K DREAMLAND,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 559/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

been re-opened u/s 147 of the Act after following the due procedure as per the Act and with prior approval of the specified authority as per Section 151 of the Act. A notice under Section 148 of the Act has been issued on 19/11/2022. In response to the notice

R K DREAMLAND,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 558/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

been re-opened u/s 147 of the Act after following the due procedure as per the Act and with prior approval of the specified authority as per section 151 of the Act. A notice under section 148 of the Act has been issued on 19/11/2022. In response to the notice

R K DREAMLAND,RAJKOT vs. DCIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 557/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

been re-opened u/s 147 of the Act after following the due procedure as per the Act and with prior approval of the specified authority as per section 151 of the Act. A notice under section 148 of the Act has been issued on 19/11/2022. In response to the notice

RK DREAMLAND,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 556/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, राजकोट न्यायपीठ, राजकोट।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT\nBEFORE DR. ARJUN

R K DREAMLAND,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJOKT

ITA 555/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, राजकोट न्यायपीठ, राजकोट।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT\nBEFORE DR. ARJUN

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 612/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

612/RJT/2025 Dff Shri Gandhi Maulana Azas Shramjivi Ashra (a) conduct any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority, with respect to the information which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment; (b) provide an opportunity of being heard to the assessee, 14***] by serving ... been pasted hereunder for your reference: 22. Reasons for according approval/ rejection Remarks: I have perused the draft order u/s 148A(d) by the specified authority to order u/s appearing in the ITBA. The proposal of the CIT(E) is 148A(d) AND/OR issuance of notice under hereby approved. section

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 611/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

612/RJT/2025 Dff Shri Gandhi Maulana Azas Shramjivi Ashra (a) conduct any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority, with respect to the information which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment; (b) provide an opportunity of being heard to the assessee, 14***] by serving ... been pasted hereunder for your reference: 22. Reasons for according approval/ rejection Remarks: I have perused the draft order u/s 148A(d) by the specified authority to order u/s appearing in the ITBA. The proposal of the CIT(E) is 148A(d) AND/OR issuance of notice under hereby approved. section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. RADHE DEVELOPERS, RAJKOT

ITA 687/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No. 549 & 550/Rjt/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 (Hybrid Hearing) Radhe Developers Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-1 . Office No. 47, Ankur Commercial Center, Opp. Income Tax Office, Amruta Swaminarayan Gurukul, Estate Building, Near Girnar Gondal Road, Rajkot Cinema, M G Road, Rajkot Rajkot-360001 Rajkot-360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aatfr3387E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147

been issued on 19/11/2022 to the assessee after following due procedure as per the Act and with prior approval of the specified authority as per section 151 of the Act. In response to the notice issued under section 148, the assessee has filed an income tax return on 23/11/2022, declaring

Showing 1–20 of 1,163 · Page 1 of 59

...