Yunus Haji Ibrahim Fazawafa v. CIT

70 Taxmann.com 93High Court2016#10752 most cited
10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2023.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Yunus Haji Ibrahim Fazawafa v. CIT

VINOD KARSANBHAI PATEL,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 17, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7384/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Vinod Karsanbhai Patel, The Acit, Central Circle-17, 208/2885, 2Nd Floor, Haryana Singh Road, Delhi Karol Bagh, Delhi 110005 Vs. Pan Aacpp 0956 G (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Hiren Mehta, Ca Shri Nirbhay Mehta, Ca For Revenue : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 11.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.06.2023 Order Per Chandra Mohan Garg:- This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 05.12.2022 Of The Ld. Nfac, New Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Ld. Assessee Representative (Ar) Submitted That The Assessee Does Not Want To Press Ground No. 1 & 2 & Hence The Same Are Dismissed Has Not Pressed. Ground No. 6 Is General In Nature Which Requires No Specific Adjudication. Remaining Effective Grounds For Adjudication Are As Follows:-

For Appellant: Shri Hiren Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Assessment Year: 2010-11 Vinod Karsanbhai Patel, The ACIT, Central Circle-17, 208/2885, 2nd Floor, Haryana Singh Road, Delhi Karol Bagh, Delhi 110005 vs. PAN AACPP 0956 G (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Hiren Mehta, CA Shri Nirbhay Mehta, CA For Revenue : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 11.04.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2023 ORDER Per Chandra Mohan Garg:- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 05.12.2022 of the Ld. NFAC, New Delhi, relating…

AKAY INDUSTRIES P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 5(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 748/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Feb 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.748/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11) M/S Akay Industries P. Ltd., Income Tax Officer – बनाम/ 22A Film Centre, 5(1)(1), V. 2 Nd Floor, 68 Tardeo Road, Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai – 400 034. Mumbai – 400 020. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aaaca9228K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Sachhidanand Dubey
Section 143(3)Section 234Section 271(1)Section 40A(2)(b)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “J” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.748/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11) M/s Akay Industries P. Ltd., Income Tax Officer – बनाम/ 22A Film Centre, 5(1)(1), v. 2 nd floor, 68 Tardeo Road, Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai – 400 034. Mumbai – 400 020. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN : AAACA9228K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Bhupendra Shah Revenue by : Shri Sachhidanand Dubey, DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date of Hearing : 10-11-…

Yunus Haji Ibrahim Fazawafa v. CIT (70 Taxmann.com 93) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax