Yokogawa IA Technologies India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT

112 Taxmann.com 341Reported decision2019#22150 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2023.

Issues it is cited on

associated enterprises associated enterprise international transaction transfer company section 143(3)india total income business document

Judgments citing Yokogawa IA Technologies India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT

SERCO INDIA PVT. LTD.,PUNE vs. DCIT, GURGAON

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 1432/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shrianil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri N. K. Choudhry, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, Ld. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. CIT (DR)

Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, DELHI BEFORE SHRIANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AM & SHRI N. K. CHOUDHRY, JM I.T.A. No. 1432/Del/2016 Assessment Year: 2011-12) Serco India Pvt. Ltd. DCIT Circle-4(1), 3rd Floor, Vanijya Nikunj, C/o Traveltime Car Rental Pvt. Ltd., Office No. 105, HSIIDC Building, Udyog Astral Court, B Wing, Near Vs. Vihar, Phase-V, Near Gaikwad Petrol Pump, Shankar Chowk, NH-8, Sanewadi, Aundh, Pune- Gurgaon. 411007. PAN No.AAJCS6704P (Appellant) (Respondent) : Appellant by : Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, Ld. Adv &Sh. Mahfuzur Rehman, Ld. CA Respondent by : Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. CIT…

AGGRESSIVE DIGITAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 874/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 874/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Aggressive Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer, Plot No. 596-597, Sector-8, Imt Ward-1(1), Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana-122050 Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aanca7751J Assessee By : Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Anand Kumar Kedia, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 06.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.01.2022

For Appellant: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Anand Kumar Kedia, CIT DR

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I-1’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 874/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Aggressive Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer, Plot No. 596-597, Sector-8, IMT Ward-1(1), Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana-122050 Gurgaon (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AANCA7751J Assessee by : Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Anand Kumar Kedia, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 06.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.01.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the…

SERCO INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1460/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jan 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1460/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Serco India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 6Th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 8, Circle-2, Dlf Cyber City, Phase-Ii, Gurgaon Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aajcs6704P Assessee By : Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.01.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I-2’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1460/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Serco India Pvt. Ltd., Vs DCIT, 6th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 8, Circle-2, DLF Cyber City, Phase-II, Gurgaon Gurgaon (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAJCS6704P Assessee by : Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, CA Revenue by : Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 04.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.01.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated…