(x) in (a) Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

85 Taxmann.com 330High Court2017#6729 most cited

What is (x) in (a) Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. authority for?

A notice issued to an entity that has been dissolved and no longer exists is void ab initio and bad in law.

17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. · Section 148 · dissolved entity · notice to dead entity · void ab initio · bad in law · non-existent company · assessment order · curable defect

Also reported as

250 Taxmann 409

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing (x) in (a) Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

M/S Basundhara Goods (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, WD-5(4), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 674/KOL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Am & Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Jm] I.T.A. No. 674/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Basundhara Goods (P) Ltd.................................…………………………..........Appellant (Formerly Merged With Param Mitra Investments Ltd.)Kolkata 129, Transport Centre, Rohtak Road, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi – 110 035 [Pan : Aadcb 1931 H] Income Tax Officer Kolkata..…………………………………………………………......Respondent Ward 5(4), Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata – 700 069 Appearances By: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, Fca Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri P.K. Srihari, Cit (Dr) Appearing On Behalf Of The Revenue. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 16, 2018 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 23, 2018 Order Per P.M. Jagtap, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) – 6, Kolkata Dated 29.02.2016. 2. The Relevant Facts Of The Case Giving Rise To This Appeal Are That The Assessee Is A Company Which Is Engaged In The Business Of Share Dealing & Investment. The Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration Was Filed By It On 14.08.2008 Declaring A Total Income Of Rs. 749/-. In The Assessment Originally Completed Under Section 147/143(3) Vide An Order Dated 30.04.2010, The Total Income Of The Assessee Was Determined By The A.O. At Rs. 17,720/-. The Said Assessment Was Subsequently Set Aside By The Ld. Cit Vide An Order

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH ‘C’, KOLKATA [Before Shri P.M. Jagtap, AM and Shri Aby. T. Varkey, JM] I.T.A. No. 674/Kol/2016 Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Basundhara Goods (P) Ltd.................................…………………………..........Appellant (Formerly merged with Param Mitra Investments Ltd.)Kolkata 129, Transport Centre, Rohtak Road, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi – 110 035 [PAN : AADCB 1931 H] Income Tax Officer Kolkata..…………………………………………………………......Respondent Ward 5(4), Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata – 700 069 Appearances by: Shri Ravi Tulsiyan, FCA appearing on behalf of the A…

(x) in (a) Pr. CIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (85 Taxmann.com 330) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax