Vivek v. DCIT, CC-2(i/c) Trichy

121 Taxmann.com 366High Court2020#7228 most cited
15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Vivek v. DCIT, CC-2(i/c) Trichy

VINODHINI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), CHENNAI

Appeal stand allowed

ITA 921/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.921/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रण वष9 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Mrs. Vinodhini Acit बनाम/ Flat No.14, Door No.98, Central Circle-1(2) Harrington Road, Chetpet, Vs. Chennai. Chennai-600 031. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Bmapv-2726-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate)- Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som (Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 20-06-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18-09-2024

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate)- Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 153CSection 2(14)

…een submitted that the addition has been made on the basis of seized material, information emanating therefrom and the sworn statement of assessee’s son. Reference has been made to the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of M. Vivek vs. DCIT (121 Taxmann.com 366) for the submissions that loose sheets picked up during search u/s 132 falls within the definition of ‘documents’ as mentioned in Sec.132(4) and therefore, it has got evidentiary value. The copy of proforma for recording of satisfaction u/s 153C has also been placed on record. The decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Ch…

Vivek v. DCIT, CC-2(i/c) Trichy (121 Taxmann.com 366) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax