(v) A.C.I.T. Vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal

133 TTJ 818Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2010#8737 most cited

What is (v) A.C.I.T. Vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal authority for?

The Assessing Officer cannot reopen a concluded assessment without a valid reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. If no incriminating material is found during a search, the Assessing Officer cannot assume undisclosed income.

12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2019.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. Pratibha Industries Ltd. · ACIT v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal · reassessment · Section 147 · Section 148 · escaped income · incriminating material · search · unexplained income · share capital · share premium

Judgments citing (v) A.C.I.T. Vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal

(v) A.C.I.T. Vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal (133 TTJ 818) — Cited in 12 Judgments | BharatTax