(v) A.C.I.T. Vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal
133 TTJ 818Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2010#8737 most cited
What is (v) A.C.I.T. Vs. Pratibha Industries Ltd. (2013) 141 I.T.D. 151 (Mumbai) (vi) A.C.I.T v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal authority for?
The Assessing Officer cannot reopen a concluded assessment without a valid reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. If no incriminating material is found during a search, the Assessing Officer cannot assume undisclosed income.
12
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2019.
Also referred to as
ACIT v. Pratibha Industries Ltd. · ACIT v. Kamal Kumar S. Agarwal · reassessment · Section 147 · Section 148 · escaped income · incriminating material · search · unexplained income · share capital · share premium