Uttarakhand in CIT v. Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd.

35 Taxmann.com 54Reported decision2013#1201 most cited

What is Uttarakhand in CIT v. Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. authority for?

Employees' contributions to welfare funds, such as provident fund or ESI, paid by the assessee before the due date for furnishing the return of income under Section 139(1) are an allowable deduction under Section 43B of the Income-tax Act.

94

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2022.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. · Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. · Section 43B · Section 139(1) · Section 36(1)(va) · employees' contribution deduction · provident fund ESI payment · payment before return due date · allowable deduction

Issues it is cited on

section 2(c)section 2(24)(x)section 2(24)section 36(1)(va)section 43bsection 36(1)section 43section 36section 139(1)section 139section 13prescribed

Judgments citing Uttarakhand in CIT v. Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd.

M/S, MADRAS HYDRAULIC HOSE PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE-4(1), CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 702/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singhand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 154Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

LATE MR.SESHADRI NAIDU DHARMARAJ REP BY LEGAL HEIR - MR.SHANKAR GANESH,CHENNAI vs. CPC, BANGALORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 661/CHNY/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singhand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

LATE MR.SESHADRI NAIDU DHARMARAJ REP BY LEGAL HEIR - MR.SHANKAR GANESH,CHENNAI vs. CPC, BANGALORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 660/CHNY/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Sept 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singhand Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

MANSOOR AIYAZ EBRAHIM,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRCTOR OF INCOMETAX,CPC, BANGALORE

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 622/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Sonjoy Sarma

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Narayanan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. M.S. Deeeptha (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

MANSOOR AIYAZ EBRAHIM,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRCTOR OF INCOMETAX,CPC, BANGALORE

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 621/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Sonjoy Sarma

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Narayanan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. M.S. Deeeptha (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

TONGLIT AUTOGISTIC PRIVATE LIMITED ,CHENNAI vs. ASST DIRECTOR OF IT , CPC INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT , BANGLORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 566/CHNY/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Aug 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Sonjoy Sarma

For Appellant: Shri Ganesh. S (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. M.S. Deeeptha (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

HARI PRAKASH,GURUGRAM vs. ITIO WARD 62(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2361/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri J.S. Kochar, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 Hari Prakash, Vs. Income Tax Officer, House No. 598, Ward 62(1), Sector-10, New Delhi. Gurgram, Haryana, Pin 122 001 PAN AHKPP8457D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri J.S. Kochar, CA Department by : Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 25.05.2022 Date of 25.05.2022 pronouncement O R D E R PER ASTHA CHANDRA The appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 29.12.2017 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 20, New D…

M/S AMALGAMATIONS REPCO LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CPC, BANGALORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 559/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri R,Vijayaraghvan (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.559/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Amalgamations Repco Limited DCIT बनाम/ No.136, J Graden, GNT Road CPC, Vs. Ponnaiamman Medu. Chennai – 600 110 Bengaluru – 560 100 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AADCA-8200-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri R,Vijayaraghva…

DCIT, CC -3 (1),, CHENNAI vs. M/S. TALENTPRO INDIA HR PVT. LTD.,, CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 459/CHNY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) –Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

….2014); Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT V/s Aimil Ltd. (188 Taxman 265 23.12.2009); Hon’ble Patna High Court in the case of Bihar State Warehousing Corp. Ltd. (88 Taxmann.com 455; 16.03.2016); Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand in CIT V/s Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54; 20.05.2013); Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in CIT V/s Vijay Shree Ltd. (43 Taxmann.com 396; 06.09.2011). Thus, pre-dominant view of majority of Hon’ble High Court is in assessee’s favor wherein it was held that the Employees’ Contribution paid by the assessee before due date of furnishing of return of income u/s 139(1) would be an allowab…

GURUDEV MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE, BENGALURU

Appeal is allowed

ITA 490/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ7वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.490/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2020-21) Gurudev Motors Pvt. Ltd. ADIT बनाम/ No.559, Mount Road, Teynampet, CPC, Vs. Chennai – 600 018. Bengaluru. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AACCG-2983-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (C.A)-Ld. AR ""थ"…

ANJAPPAR CHETTINAD AC RESTAURANT,CHENNAI vs. ITO. NON CORP WARD 1(1), CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 444/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri V. Padmanabhan(C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT)-Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.444/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Anjappar Chettinad AC Restaurant ITO Ashok Pillar Non Corporate Ward-1(1), बनाम/ 17/35, Suprabath Flats, Thyagaraya Chennai. Vs. Gramini Street, T. Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. ABAFA-7864-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अ…

ITO,WARD1(1), TRICHY vs. ANJAPPAR CHETTINAD RESTAURANT, TRICHY

Appeal is allowed

ITA 443/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri V. Padmanabhan(C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT)-Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.443/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Anjappar Chettinad Restaurant Trichy ITO बनाम/ 17/18, AS Complex, Annamalai Nagar, Ward-1(1), Vs. Trichy – 620 018. Trichy. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. ABFFA-1417-R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri V. Padmanabhan…

ANJAPPAR CHETTINAD RESTAURANT ADAYAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NON COP WARD-15(1), CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 442/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri V. Padmanabhan (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT)-Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.442/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Anjappar Chettinad Restaurant Adyar ITO बनाम/ 5, Dev Apartments, 1st Main Road, Non Corporate Ward-15(1), Vs. KB Nagar, Chennai – 600 020. Chennai. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAYFA-4758-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant…

SRI MOOKAMBIKA INFOSOLUTIONS PVT LTD,MADURAI vs. PCIT 1, MADURAI

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 425/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Balakrishnan (for assessee)For Respondent: Shri Guru Bashyam (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ7वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.425/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Sri Mookambika Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd. PCIT-1 बनाम/ 31, III Floor, Town Hall Road, Madurai. Vs. Madurai – 625 001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAOCS-3451-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri S. Balakrishnan (for ass…

SAHANA CLOTHING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,DINDIGUL vs. PCIT, MADURAI

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 417/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (C.A)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Guru Bashyam (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ7वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.417/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Sahana Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd. PCIT बनाम/ No.15, Batlagundu Road, Pithalaipatty, Madurai-1. Vs. Dindigul – 624 002. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAUCS-2984-A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (C.A…

URC CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD.,ERODE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, COIMBATORE

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 390/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Guru Bashyam (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ7वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.390/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) URC Construction Pvt. Ltd. DCIT बनाम/ 119, Power House Road, ‘ Central Circle-2, Vs. Erode – 638 001. Coimbatore. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAACU-2425-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri G. Baskar (Advocate)-Ld.…

HLF SERVICES LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE WARD, 2(3),CHENNAI, CHENNAI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 370/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.370/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2019-20) HLF Services Limited DCIT बनाम/ No.1, Sardar Patel Road, Corporate Ward 2(3), Vs. Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. Chennai. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AACCH-4777-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : None ""थ" की ओरसे/Respond…

ACP DRILLING & CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.,NAMAKKAL vs. ADIT,CPC, BANGALORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 369/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Gautham Venkatnarayanan (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT)-Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.369/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) APC Drilling & Construction Pvt Ltd. ADIT, बनाम/ No. 153, C7, R. Gopal Complex, CPC, Salem Road, Next to LMR Theatre, Bengaluru – 560 500. Vs. Namakkal – 637 001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAMCA-6660-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओ…

MS LABELS,TIRUPPUR vs. ADIT, CPC, BANGALORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 362/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Senthil Kumar (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.362/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2019-20) M.S. Labels ADIT बनाम/ 493/1, Athimara Thottam, CPC, Amman Kalyanamandapam Backside, Bengaluru. Vs. Sirupooluvapatti, Tirupur – 641 603. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAMFM-3454-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri S…

SAPPHIRE CLOTHING COMPANY (I) PVT. LIMITED,TIRUPPUR vs. ADIT,CPC, BANGALORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 361/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Senthil Kumar (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Prakash P. Kishinchandani (JCIT)-Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी वी. दुगा1 राव, "ाियक सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ8वाल ,लेखा सद3 के सम:। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.361/Chny/2022 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Sapphire Clothing Company (I) Pvt. Ltd. ADIT बनाम/ 4/87-(3), Thiruppuran Thottam, CPC, K.G. Palayam Road, Veerapandi Post, Bengaluru. Vs. Tirupur – 641 605. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAICS-9995-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ A…

Showing 1–20 of 94 · Page 1 of 5

Uttarakhand in CIT v. Kicha Sugar Co. Ltd. (35 Taxmann.com 54) — Cited in 94 Judgments | BharatTax