Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India

156 Taxmann.com 318High Court2023#2092 most cited

What is Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India authority for?

A notice issued under Section 148 by a jurisdictional Assessing Officer is valid and not rendered bad in law by Section 151A or the CBDT Notification dated March 29, 2022. This applies even with the introduction of the faceless assessment regime for reassessment proceedings.

55

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India · Section 148 notice validity · jurisdictional Assessing Officer · faceless assessment scheme · Section 151A · CBDT Notification 29-03-2022 · income escaping assessment · reassessment proceedings · 156 Taxmann.com 318 · Section 148A procedure · validity of notice by JAO

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India

MERCY EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-19(6), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly-allowed

ITA 2231/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2231/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Mercy Education Trust, The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Sree Gokulam Towers, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 19(6), Arcot Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. Pan: Aactm 6190M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.01.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.01.2026

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.CIT
Section 10Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273B

…cision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court & Hon’ble Calcutta High Court as well as the Hon’ble Single Bench of Madras High Court in favor of the Revenue and cited the following orders: :- 16 -: • Triton Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Union of India – Calcutta High Court – 156 Taxmann.com 318 • T.K.S. Builders (P) Ltd. v. ITO – Delhi High Court – 469 ITR 657 • Mark Studio India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, High Court of Madras 169 taxmann.com 542, order dated 20.12.2024 25. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. The brief facts are that the assessee is noted to be an individual and di…

Showing 120 of 55 · Page 1 of 3