Trib.) and (iii) ACIT v. Ms. Asha P. Kedia

174 Taxmann.com 99Reported decision2025#15157 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Trib.) and (iii) ACIT v. Ms. Asha P. Kedia

PARESH HIRALAL SHAH ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 34(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the CO filed by the Assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 4775/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2018-19 Mr. Paresh Hiralal Shah, Income Tax Officer, 302, Shree Krishna Sadan, Ward 34(3)(2), Paranjpe Scheme No.2, (Assessment Unit Subhash Road, Vile Parle East, Vs. Income Tax Department) Mumbai – 400 057 Kautilya Bhavan, Pan: Albps7761C Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Maharashtra - 400051 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Shashi Bekal, Ld. A.R. Revenue By : Shri Vikas Chandra, Ld. Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 10.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.11.2025 O R D E R Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry: This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 20.06.2025, Impugned Herein, Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Center (Nfac)/ Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (In Short Ld. Commissioner) U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For The A.Y. 2018-19. 2. In The Instant Case, Though The Notice U/S 148A(D) Of The Act Was Issued Within 3 Years From The End Of The Relevant Assessment Year, However, It Is Admitted That The Notice U/S 148 Of The Act Was 2 Mr. Paresh Hiralal Shah

For Appellant: Shri Shashi Bekal, Ld. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vikas Chandra, Ld. Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Mr. Paresh Hiralal Shah, Income Tax Officer, 302, Shree Krishna Sadan, Ward 34(3)(2), Paranjpe Scheme No.2, (assessment Unit Subhash Road, Vile Parle East, Vs. Income Tax Department) Mumbai – 400 057 Kautilya Bhavan, PAN: ALBPS7761C Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Maharashtra - 400051 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Shashi Bekal, Ld. A.R. Revenue by : Shri Vikas Chandra, Ld. Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 10.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 10.11.…

ANUJ SATISHKUMAR BANSAL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1267/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth, Accountant Mmber आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1267/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Anuj Satishkumar Bansal, Vs. Ito, 302, Shri Hari Appartment, Piplod Ward – 1(3)(1), Road Near Lancer Army School, Surat Surat 395007, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Bwxpb3655C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Ramesh Malpani, Ca Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/07/2025

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 234ASection 250Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1267/SRT/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid hearing) Anuj Satishkumar Bansal, Vs. ITO, 302, Shri Hari Appartment, Piplod Ward – 1(3)(1), Road Near Lancer Army School, Surat Surat 395007, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: BWXPB3655C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Ramesh Malpani, CA Respondent by Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 08/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 31/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, A…

Trib.) and (iii) ACIT v. Ms. Asha P. Kedia (174 Taxmann.com 99) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax