TR 273 (Bom), CIT v. Bowrisankara Stemp Ferry Co. (1973) 87 ITR 650 (AP), CIT v. Late G.D.Naidu and Ors.

291 ITR 107High Court2007#3577 most cited
33

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2022.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Bowrisankara Stemp Ferry Co. · 291 ITR 107 · elimination of competition · acquisition of business · enhancement of lease rent

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing TR 273 (Bom), CIT v. Bowrisankara Stemp Ferry Co. (1973) 87 ITR 650 (AP), CIT v. Late G.D.Naidu and Ors.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE vs. M/S. WIPRO GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1020/BANG/2007[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Nov 2022AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2000-01 M/S. Wipro Ge The Deputy Medical Systems Ltd., Commissioner Of Plot No. 4, Kadugodi Income Tax, Indl. Area, Central Circle – Sadaramangala, 1(3), Vs. Bangalore – 560 067. Bangalore. Pan: Aaacw1685G Appellant Respondent : Shri K.R. Pradeep & Assessee By Smt. Girija G.P., Advocates : Shri K.R. Narayana, Addl. Revenue By Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 21-10-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-11-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Arises Out Of Remand By Hon'Ble Karnataka High Court In Ita No. 1058/2008 Vide Order Dated 02/12/2016 In An Appeal Filed By Revenue. 2. The Ld.Ar Submitted That Revenue Filed Appeal Before The Hon’Ble Karnataka High Court Against Order Dated 20/06/2008 Passed By This Tribunal On Following Issues. 1) Reduction In Claim Of Exemption Of Profits U/S. 10A. 2) Reduction In Claim U/S. 80Hhe.

For Respondent: Shri K.R. Pradeep &
Section 10ASection 80HSection 80I

…ayment was made. In support of his submissions he relied on following decisions:  Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Empire Jute CO.Ltd vs. CIT reported in (1980) 124 ITR 1;  Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in case of CIT vs. Mc.Dowell & Co.Ltd reported in (2007)291 ITR 107  Hon’ble Madras High Court in case of Asianet Communications Ltd vs. CIT reported in (2018) 407 ITR 706  Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in case of CIT vs. M/s. Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt.Ltd. in dated 09/01/2020 16. Ld.AR argued that the revenue is admitting to the fact that the payments are made towards the restrictive covenant and therefor…

Showing 120 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

TR 273 (Bom), CIT v. Bowrisankara Stemp Ferry Co. (1973) 87 ITR 650 (AP), CIT v. Late G.D.Naidu and Ors. (291 ITR 107) — Cited in 33 Judgments | BharatTax