Landmark Cases on Set-off and Carry Forward of Losses

53 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd.
391 ITR 274 · 2017 · Supreme Court
290
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 10A or 10AA of the Income-tax Act is computed on the profits of the eligible unit without first setting off losses from other units or non-eligible units. Conversely, losses incurred by an eligible unit are allowed to be set off against the assessee's other taxable business profits.

Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. v. ACIT
340 ITR 477 · 2012 · High Court
213
citing judgments

If unabsorbed depreciation or losses from years prior to the initial assessment year for Section 80-IA claim have already been set off against other income, they cannot be notionally carried forward again to reduce the profits of the eligible unit for computing deduction under Section 80-IA. The notional carry forward provision under Section 80-IA(5) applies only to unabsorbed depreciation or losses that have not yet been absorbed.

CIT v. J.H. Gotla
156 ITR 323 · 1985 · Supreme Court
176
citing judgments

The Supreme Court holds that for income tax purposes, the term 'income' includes 'loss,' allowing for the set-off of a spouse's or minor child's business losses when their income is clubbed with the assessee. This decision emphasizes interpreting tax statutes, especially benevolent provisions, by considering the legislative scheme over a strict literal construction.

Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT
247 ITR 290 · 2001 · High Court
136
citing judgments

Income deemed under sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B, or 69C of the Income-tax Act is a distinct category, separate from regular heads of income under Section 14, and losses from other heads, including business losses, cannot be set off against such deemed income.

CIT v. Ace Builders (P) Ltd.
281 ITR 210 · 2005 · High Court
88
citing judgments

The deeming fiction in Section 50, which treats capital gains from depreciable assets as short-term, applies only for the purpose of computing capital gains under that section. For other provisions, such as set-off of losses under Section 74 or deductions under Section 54E/54EC, the asset's original character (long-term or short-term) is to be considered.

Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer (IT) & Another
299 ITR 444 · 2008 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

When computing deductions under Chapter VI-A, such as Section 80IA, losses from other business undertakings must be set off against the profits of the eligible undertaking before calculating the deduction. No deduction under Section 80IA is permissible if the overall 'Profits & Gains of Business or Profession' results in a loss.

CIT v. Hariprasad & Company Pvt. Ltd.
99 ITR 118 · 1975 · Supreme Court
78
citing judgments

The terms 'income' or 'profits and gains' are inclusive of losses, signifying that losses are 'minus income' to be factored into the computation of taxable income. Therefore, set-off and carry forward provisions for losses apply exclusively to taxable income or gains and cannot be pressed into service against non-taxable gains, such as those exempt under a DTAA or other specific provisions.

CIT v. Himatasingike Seide Ltd.
286 ITR 255 · 2006 · High Court
73
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act is to be allowed only after setting off unabsorbed depreciation and brought forward business losses against the profits of the business.

CIT v. Black & Veatch Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
348 ITR 72 · 2012 · High Court
63
citing judgments

Depreciation, including unabsorbed depreciation, should not be reduced from the profits of an undertaking eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when computing the deduction amount.

CIT v. DLF Commercial Developers Ltd.
35 Taxmann.com 280 · 2013 · High Court
51
citing judgments

Loss incurred by certain types of companies in trading derivatives is considered speculative loss under the Explanation to Section 73, as the value of stock derivatives depends on shares. Such speculative losses are ineligible for set-off or carry forward against business income.

CIT v. S. Ajit Kumar
367 ITR 761 · 2014 · High Court
49
citing judgments
CIT v. Manmohan Das
59 ITR 699 · 1966 · Supreme Court
47
citing judgments

The eligibility for an assessee to carry forward and set off losses, including capital losses, against future income is determined by the Assessing Officer in the year the set-off is claimed, not in the year the loss was incurred.

Ch. Mohan v ACIT-(2014) 369 ITR 189 (Andhra Pradesh) v. P Mohammed
349 ITR 442 · 2012 · High Court
44
citing judgments

An additional claim for set-off of losses can be raised before appellate authorities.

CH Mohan v. ACIT
369 ITR 189 · 2014 · High Court
42
citing judgments

Losses from periods prior to a search assessment must be allowed, even if not claimed in the original return of income, if they can be quantified at the appellate stage.

CIT v. Subros Educational Society
166 DTR 257 · 2018 · Supreme Court
36
citing judgments

Excess application or expenditure of income for a charitable purpose can be carried forward for set-off against income in subsequent years.

CIT v. Select Holiday Resorts (P) Ltd.
207 CTR 239 · 2007 · High Court
34
citing judgments

Section 79, which prohibits carrying forward losses when there is a change in shareholding, does not apply if the beneficial shareholders remain the same, even after amalgamation or merger.

CIT v. Darshan Securities (P) Ltd.
341 ITR 556 · 2012 · High Court
27
citing judgments

A company involved in the purchase and sale of shares is deemed to be carrying on a speculative business to the extent of such transactions, unless it falls under an exception to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act.

Vijaya Hospitality and Resorts Ltd. v. CIT
419 ITR 322 · 2019 · High Court
26
citing judgments

There is no bar under the Income Tax Act to setting off losses against deemed income under sections 68 to 69.

CIT v. Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Factory Ltd.
224 ITR 605 · 1997 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Gross total income must be computed by setting off losses, including brought-forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, before any deductions under Chapter VI-A can be considered. Deductions under Chapter VI-A are only available if the resulting gross total income is positive.

Snam Progetti S.P.A v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi
132 ITR 70 · 1981 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Brought forward business loss can be set off against interest earned from bank deposits in a subsequent year if the interest can be attributed to a business activity, even if assessed under 'income from other sources'. However, interest on parked surplus funds generally qualifies as income from other sources and not business income, particularly in the context of Section 80HHC.

CIT v. Mewar Oil and General Mills Ltd. (No. 1)
271 ITR 311 · 2004 · High Court
24
citing judgments

Income from a new industrial undertaking cannot be recomputed by setting off carry forward unabsorbed depreciation or depreciation allowance from previous years if there were no carry forward losses from the prior year to be set off against the current year's income.

1. Lason India (Vetri Software) v. ITO (
129 TTJ 273 · ITAT
21
citing judgments

Units eligible for Section 10B exemption need not have their losses carried forward separately; these losses can be set off against normal taxable income.

CIT v. Anil H. Lad
45 Taxmann.com 98 · 2014 · High Court
20
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing deduction under Section 80-IA, profits of other businesses do not need to be notionally brought forward and have no effect on the deduction claimed. Losses of earlier years already set off cannot be notionally set off again against current income eligible for deduction.

Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. v. DCIT
69 SOT 383 · 2015 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

Long-term capital loss on the sale of shares can be set off and carried forward under sections 70 and 71, as section 10(38) only exempts long-term capital gains and does not encompass capital losses.

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirupur v. Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd.
76 Taxmann.com 176 · 2016 · Supreme Court
19
citing judgments

Profits of other businesses cannot be notionally brought forward and set off against profits of an eligible business under Section 80-IA(5) as the Income-Tax Act does not provide for such a mandate.

J.S. Capital LLC v. ACIT (Int. Taxation)
160 Taxmann.com 286 · 2024 · Reported
18
citing judgments

The set-off of short-term capital loss against capital gains is permissible under section 70(2) of the Income-tax Act, regardless of whether the gains are taxed at normal rates or special rates. This applies even when the assessee has capital gains chargeable to tax at different rates.

CIT v. Karamchand Premchand Ltd.
40 ITR 106 · 1960 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

Capital losses can be carried forward to subsequent assessment years. The decision emphasizes that if a business conducted outside British India resulted in a loss, it could not be set off against profits from a business within British India, based on the interpretation of Section 5 of the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947.

Rajan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO
41 ITD 469 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

The Explanation to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with the carry forward of losses in share trading, is applicable only after the gross total income has been computed. If the income under heads other than business constitutes the majority of the gross total income, the Explanation to Section 73 does not apply.

Shree Capital Services Ltd. v. ACIT
121 ITD 498 · 2009 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Forex derivative transactions are classified as speculative if they do not settle on actual delivery and are considered a speculative bet on the currency or a wager contract. Such transactions, resulting in losses and not intended for hedging, do not qualify for consideration as hedging.

CIT v. Yokogowa India Ltd.
145 DTR 1 · 2017 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments
Snowtex Investment Limited v. PCIT
414 ITR 227 · 2019 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

The Supreme Court held that losses from delivery-based share trading cannot be set off against profits from derivatives trading if the principal business of the assessee is not the granting of loans and advances, as per the explanation to Section 73.

AM Shah v. CIT 238 IT12 415 (Guj); GT Vs. Sint. P.K. Koehammu Anna, Peroke
125 ITR 624 · 1980 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments
H.H. Sir Rama Verma v. CIT
205 ITR 433 · 1994 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

Long-term capital losses brought forward from earlier years must be set off against long-term capital gains of the current assessment year before any deduction under Section 80T is allowed.

Karele International Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 2
373 ITR 574 · 2015 · High Court
15
citing judgments
Royal Calcutta Turf Club v. CIT
144 ITR 709 · 1983 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Capital loss arising from the sale of shares can be carried forward to subsequent years. The accounting treatment of shares as a capital asset in the books of account confirms that their sale generates capital profit or loss.

CIT v. Shirke Construction Equipment Pvt. Ltd.
291 ITR 380 · 2007 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

Brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years must be set off against the income of the current year before calculating deductions under Chapter VIA of the Act, including those under Section 10A.

CIT v. Galaxy Surfactants Ltd.
343 ITR 108 · 2012 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in the total income does not attract the provisions of Section 14A of the Act. Additionally, the carry forward of losses from a unit eligible for deduction under Section 10B is permissible.

Western States Trading (P) Ltd. v. CIT
80 ITR 21 · 1971 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

Interest earned on fixed deposits, even if these deposits originate from stock-in-trade, is considered income from other sources and should be eligible for set-off against brought-forward losses.

Navin Bharat Industries Ltd. v. DCIT
90 ITD 1 · 2004 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Losses of units eligible for deduction under section 10A cannot be set off against the profits of other units eligible for section 10A deduction when calculating the eligible deduction. However, brought forward losses of units showing positive income for section 10A purposes can be set off.

CIT Vs. Mithilesh Kumari (1973) 92 ITR 9 (Del), Addl.CIT v. K.S. Gupta
120 ITD 469 · 2009 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Long-term capital loss on the sale of shares can be set off against long-term capital loss on the sale of land, in accordance with Section 70(3) of the Income Tax Act.

Eastern Aviation & Industries Ltd. v. CIT
208 ITR 1023 · 1994 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Loss from share trading is to be taken into account, and if the loss from share trading exceeds the income from dividend or capital gains, the predominant nature of income can be considered as loss from share trading, which may impact the classification of business income or allow for set-off of losses.

CIT v. RatanlalVyaparilal Jain
21 SOT 29 · 2008 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The decision in CIT v. Ratanlal Vyaparilal Jain, 21 SOT 29, is discussed in the context of setting off business loss brought forward from AY 1999-2000, noting it stands on a different footing due to the insertion of words "ending before 1.4.2001" in a sub-section.

Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer
254 ITR 608 · 2002 · High Court
12
citing judgments

An assessee cannot claim deductions under Chapter VI-A if, after setting off business losses of earlier years against income, the gross total income becomes nil. This principle applies even when considering profits from an eligible business unit.

First State Investments (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. ADIT
33 SOT 26 · 2009 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The phrase 'under similar computation' in Section 70(2) refers to the computation of capital gains as per Sections 45-55 of the Income Tax Act, not the tax rate applicable. Therefore, short-term capital losses can be set off against short-term capital gains taxed at different rates.

Dy. CIT v. Baljit Securities (P.) Ltd.
68 SOT 82 · 2015 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Losses from a speculative business can only be set off against profits from another speculative business. Losses from speculative transactions cannot be set off against profits from non-speculative transactions.

DIT v. Society for Applied Microwave Electronic Engineering & Research
106 Taxmann.com 204 · 2019 · Supreme Court
11
citing judgments

A charitable trust can carry forward a deficit arising from excessive expenditure over income to be set off against future income, without this constituting a double benefit of accumulation or corpus donation.

CIT v. S.S. Thiagarajan
129 ITR 115 · 1981 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Loss from a source of income that is entirely exempt from tax cannot be set off against income from a different source or under a different head. This principle applies even if the loss is incurred on assets like shares that would otherwise attract capital gains tax.

Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
21 Taxmann.com 95 · 2012 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Losses from earlier years already absorbed against profits of other businesses cannot be notionally brought forward and set off against the profits of an eligible business for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 80IA(5) of the Income-tax Act, as there is no such mandate in the said provision.

Fiduciary Shares & Stock (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
70 Taxmann.com 23 · 2016 · ITAT
11
citing judgments

A company whose principal business is trading in shares incurs a loss from share trading that is treated as normal business loss, not speculation loss, and can be adjusted against other business income.

DCIT v. Shree Ram Electrocast (P) Ltd.
84 Taxmann.com 63 · 2017 · Reported
11
citing judgments

A change in the head of loss from business to speculative loss does not automatically warrant an inference of concealment of income for the purpose of invoking penalty provisions.