Landmark Cases on Salary and Perquisites

17 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries Ltd. V. ACIT (2004) 086 TTJ 0574 (KOL) Nestle India Ltd. v. ACIT
59 ITD 353 · 1996 · ITAT
155
citing judgments

An assessee's bona fide estimate of employee salary, when valuing perquisites like residential accommodation, can be accepted if the department only brings contrary information to their notice during assessment proceedings.

306 ITR (AT) 78 (Del) Usha Martin Industries Ltd. v. ACIT
61 ITD 444 · 1997 · ITAT
155
citing judgments
CIT v. ITI Ltd.
313 ITR 1 · 2009 · Supreme Court
142
citing judgments

An employer is not statutorily obligated to collect evidence from employees regarding the actual utilization of amounts paid towards leave travel concession or conveyance allowance, unless specific requirements are mandated by law or a CBDT circular.

CIT v. Infosys Technologies Ltd.
297 ITR 167 · 2008 · Supreme Court
115
citing judgments

Allotment of shares to employees under an Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP) before April 1, 2000, is not a taxable perquisite if the benefit's value is unascertainable at the time of option exercise due to conditions like a lock-in period.

India Ltd. v. ACIT (1997) 61 ITD 444 (Del) Indian Airlines Ltd. v. ACIT
93 Taxmann.com 89 · 2018 · Reported
64
citing judgments

An assessee's bona fide estimate of employee perquisites, by valuing residential accommodation as if employees were of the Central Government, can be accepted.

CIT Vs. L&T Ltd (2009) 313 ITR 1 (SC0 2. CIT Vs. ITI Ltd. (2009) 221 CTR (SC) 609 3. CIT v. Gostino Mario & Others
323 ITR 670 · 2010 · High Court
62
citing judgments

An assessee-employer is not bound to collect and verify proof of journey and actual expenditure before granting exemption under Section 10(5).

ACIT(TDS) v. SAP Labs India(P.)Ltd.
36 Taxmann.com 200 · 2013 · ITAT
60
citing judgments

The case is authority for the proposition that medical reimbursement provided by an employer to its employees is a perquisite, and therefore, the employer is liable to deduct tax at source (TDS) on such payments. This is in line with the treatment of similar benefits like cash medical benefits.

ACIT v. Bharat V.Patel
92 Taxmann.com 336 · 2018 · Reported
60
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be subjected to tax in the absence of a specific provision allowing for such taxation.

Hon’ble Judges in Reshma Kumari & Ors. v. Madan Mohan & Anr.
9 SCC 65 · 2013 · Reported
31
citing judgments

In cases involving a deceased who was self-employed or earned a fixed salary, future prospects of income increase are not granted. This principle was affirmed by a bench of three judges.

202 ITR 1014 (Del) Owen v. Pook (Inspector of Taxes)
14 SOT 204 · 2007 · High Court
30
citing judgments

A 'perquisite' is a personal advantage derived from employment, not a mere reimbursement of necessary expenses.

Emil Webber v. CIT
200 ITR 483 · 1993 · Supreme Court
27
citing judgments

The definition of 'income' under section 2(24) is inclusive, adding artificial categories without losing its natural connotation. Perquisites under section 17(2) are taxable as 'salary' when paid by an employer on behalf of an employee to discharge an obligation the employee would otherwise bear.

Yoshio Kubo v. CIT
36 Taxmann.com 1 · 2013 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Employer contributions to a pension or annuity fund are not taxable as perquisites in the year of contribution if the employee has no vested right or direct present benefit in the amount.

CIT v. L.W. Russel
53 ITR 91 · 1964 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

Payments made by an employer towards pension or annuity schemes are not taxable as perquisites in the hands of the employee unless the employee has acquired a vested right in the sum paid. Similarly, employer contributions to approved superannuation funds are not perquisites if the employee has no vested right.

Shamima Farooqui v. Shahid Khan
5 SCC 705 · 2003 · Reported
14
citing judgments

A husband's obligation to maintain his wife and family stands on a higher pedestal than his own needs. Courts should draw adverse inferences if a husband fails to disclose his exact income. Reducing maintenance drastically after retirement without reason is improper.

Ram Prashad v. CIT
86 ITR 122 · 1972 · Supreme Court
11
citing judgments

A director can have a dual capacity, acting both as a director and an employee. Control over a company does not always need to be day-to-day and can be exercised through articles of association or by virtue of designation and seniority.

CIT v. H. D. Dennis
135 ITR 1 · 1982 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Income-tax paid by an employer on behalf of an employee is considered a part of the employee's salary and is a perquisite that should be included in the computation of income tax.

SBI v. ACIT(TDS) SBI Vs ACIT(TDS)
138 Taxmann.com 102 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Leave Travel Concession (LTC) is available for employees traveling to any place in India and returning to their origin, without a foreign leg.