Landmark Cases on Charitable Trusts and Exemptions

485 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

United Educational Society v. JCIT
107 Taxmann.com 127 · 2019 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Exemption under Section 11 cannot be denied for Assessment Year 2017-18 due to belated filing of return, as the condition under Section 12A(1)(ba) was not applicable for that year.

Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust v. Commissioner of Income Tax (central)-l, Mumbai
108 Taxmann.com 272 · 2019 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

A violation of Section 13 provisions empowers an Assessing Authority to forfeit exemptions under Sections 11 and 12, but this violation cannot be the sole ground for cancelling a trust's registration under Section 12AA(3).

Pr. CIT(Exemption) v. Surat Urban Development Authority
120 Taxmann.com 407 · 2020 · High Court
12
citing judgments

An Urban Development Authority's activities, even if generating revenue, do not constitute trade, commerce, or business, entitling it to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as its objects are of general public utility.

CIT v. Shri Agastyar Trust
149 ITR 609 · Reported
12
citing judgments

A prior decision on whether a trust is charitable is res judicata and cannot be re-litigated in subsequent assessment years, even if some objects of the trust are vulnerable, provided there's no change in the trust's objects.

CIT v. Saraswath Poor Students Fund
150 ITR 142 · 1984 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Educational institutions are to be examined under sections 10(23C)(iiiab), 10(23C)(iiiad), and 10(23C)(vi), not under section 11. This is especially true when evidence shows receipt of money over and above prescribed fees for admissions, which is paid to interested parties.

Maharashtra Cricket Association v. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Pune
152 ITD 1 · 2015 · ITAT
12
citing judgments
Societe Generale Securities India (P.) Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax
157 Taxmann.com 533 · 2023 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Deduction under section 80G is permissible for CSR expenditure, provided it is not made to specifically excluded funds. The assessee must fulfill the pre-requisites of Section 263 before the Principal Commissioner can assume revisionary jurisdiction.

J.B. Educational Society v. ACIT
159 TTJ 234 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Corpus collections received by an educational society, when treated as income by the assessing officer and confirmed by the CIT(A), should be deleted in the interest of justice. This principle was considered by the Tribunal in multiple appeals.

KPTCL Davangere v. ITO
170 ITD 587 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Employees of a statutory corporation are not considered employees of the State or Central Government, making them ineligible for exemption under Section 10(10AA)(i) and rendering the employer liable for tax deduction at source.

Tax v. Madhya Pradesh Anaj Tilhan Vyapari Mahasangh
171 ITR 677 · 1988 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Contributions are voluntary if made willingly, without compulsion, and gratuitously. This applies when determining if a receipt constitutes income, particularly under Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act.

Kaluram Ganeshram (HUF) v. CIT
172 ITR 154 · 1988 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Only net income, not gross receipts, should be taxed, and this principle is applied even when an assessment order is passed under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, suggesting a need for verification of expenditure by the Assessing Officer.

CIT v. Natwarlal Chowdhury Trust
189 ITR 656 · 1991 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A trust is entitled to accumulate 15% of its total income, which includes deemed income under Section 11(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This accumulation benefit can be claimed even on deemed income.

ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) v. MANAV
20 SOT 517 · 2008 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The benefit of accumulation of income under sections 11 and 12 cannot be denied for failure to file Form No. 10 during assessment proceedings, as it can be filed at any time during the pendency of such proceedings.

CIT v. Devradhan Madhavlal Genda Trust
230 ITR 714 · 1998 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Filing of the audit report in Form No. 10B with the return of income is not mandatory for claiming exemption under Section 11. If the report is filed after the return but within the period permitted by law, the exemption cannot be denied.

CIT v. Sohanlal Singhania
235 ITR 616 · 1999 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Donating shares, rather than money, does not qualify for deduction under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, as the phrase 'any sum paid' refers to a 'sum of money paid'.

CIT v. Rajasthan State Text Book Board
244 ITR 667 · 2000 · High Court
12
citing judgments

An educational institution existing solely for education is not for the purpose of Section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Such an institution may be eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab).

ICICI Prudential Insurance Co. Ltd. v. ACIT
28 Taxmann.com 257 · 2012 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Exemption under Section 10 is allowable even when income is computed under Section 44 of the IT Act. This applies to specific exempt incomes like those under Section 10(23AAB) for pension business and Section 10(34) for dividends, even if the AO considers them part of the life insurance business income.

I. ICAI Accounting Research Foundation and Ors. v. DGIT
321 ITR 73 · 2010 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Activities of an organization are not inherently commercial or for profit merely because they generate receipts or involve subscriptions, especially if they are conducted to achieve the main objects of a charitable trust.

CIT v. Agriculture Market Committee
337 ITR 299 · 2011 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The insertion of Section 10(26AAB) of the Income Tax Act, exempting agricultural market committees from income tax, is not retrospective in operation.

CIT v. Technovate E Solutions P.Ltd.
354 ITR 110 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Approval from the Director of STPI is sufficient for claiming deduction under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act, even for Export Oriented Units (EOUs).

India Comnet International v. Income Tax Officer
354 ITR 673 · 2013 · Supreme Court
12
citing judgments

Income by way of interest from an eligible undertaking under Section 10A cannot be considered part of profits and gains derived from the undertaking unless a close nexus between the interest income and the undertaking's activities is established.

ACIT v. Premier of ACIT Vs. Premier Consolidated Capital Trust (1) Ltd.
4 SOT 793 · 2004 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Dividend income is treated similarly for the purpose of Section 10(33) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Jammu Development Authority v. UOI
52 SOT 153 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The Jammu Development Authority was engaged in activities to promote planning and development through auctions. The specific nature of these activities, particularly whether they were commercial in nature and thus not for general public utility, was considered in determining eligibility for exemptions.

Sree Sree Ramkrishna Samity v. DCIT
64 Taxmann.com 330 · 2015 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Amendments to Section 12A, particularly those inserted to remedy unintended consequences, are retrospective. A proviso that clarifies or makes a section workable should be treated as retrospective to ensure reasonable interpretation.

Redington India Ltd. v. Addl.CIT, Chennai
77 Taxmann.com 215 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenses related to exempt income should be restricted to the amount of exempt income earned, and no disallowance can be made for notional or anticipated income.

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Jaipur v. Mahima Shiksha Samiti
79 Taxmann.com 38 · 2017 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

When assessing the reasonableness of expenses paid by an assessee to a related entity, the Assessing Officer (AO) bears the onus to provide material showing the unreasonableness of the payment. The reasonableness of rent paid by an assessee to a company where trustees are directors can be substantiated by a rental valuation report and by showing the AO has not brought any material to disprove its reasonableness.

Satya Vijay Patel Hindu Dharamshala Trust v. CIT
86 ITR 683 · 1972 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Expenses incurred in constructing new Dharamshalas are considered advancements of a trust's charitable object and are exempt under Section 11. Running a Dharamshala is an object of general public utility, making its rental income exempt under Section 11 read with Section 2(15).

DCIT v. S.G. Investment & Industries Ltd.
89 ITD 14 · 2004 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The expression "expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of total income" under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 should be interpreted broadly.

ACIT 396 ITR 323 (Guj.) and CIT v. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation
89 Taxmann.com 366 · 2017 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A jurisdictional High Court judgment allows a claim for exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act and deletes the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer, by following this and another Gujarat High Court judgment.

ITO v. Basavaraj M. Kudarikannur
95 Taxmann.com 106 · 2018 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Interest awarded under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land is eligible for exemption under Section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Θ In The Bombay Presidency Golf Club Ltd. v. DIT
23 Taxmann.com 319 · 2012 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

An activity for the advancement of any other object of general public utility is not deemed to be for charitable purposes if it involves trade, commerce, or business, or services related thereto for consideration, irrespective of the use or application of the receipts. However, the second proviso carves out exceptions to this rule.

Hardayal Charitable and Educational Trust v. CIT
355 ITR 534 · 2013 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer's refusal to grant registration under section 12AA to a charitable trust is upheld if the trust fails to provide necessary financial documents to establish the genuineness of its activities. The jurisdictional High Court decision in Hardayal Charitable and Educational Trust was cited in this context.

Madhya Pradesh Madhyam v. CIT
256 ITR 277 · 2002 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A registration under section 12A for charitable purposes is considered sufficient proof that an institution is established for charitable purposes. Income Tax Authorities are bound by this registration and cannot challenge the charitable nature of the institution during assessment proceedings unless the registration is cancelled.

CIT v. Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society
258 ITR 548 · 2002 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Organizing seminars and conferences to disseminate knowledge and educate people in different fields is a charitable object for the benefit of the general public. Even if a section of the public benefits, it does not negate the charitable purpose.

Umaid Charitable Trust v. UOI
307 ITR 226 · 2008 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is not a watertight compartment; the Income-tax Department cannot deny renewal of a trust's charitable status under section 80G merely because one expenditure might be termed religious, unless the trust deed explicitly limits spending to a particular religion.