Landmark Cases on Capital Gains

353 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Vithalbhai P. Patel 236 ITR 1001 (Guj) and Anant Chunilal Kate v. ITO
111 ITD 1 · 2008 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Interest awarded on a capital receipt is also a capital receipt, not business income. Similarly, where a transfer of property becomes null and void due to subsequent events, no capital gains can accrue.

CIT v. J. Dalmia
149 ITR 215 · 1984 · High Court
18
citing judgments

An amount received for relinquishing the right to sue or for settlement of disputes is a capital receipt, not assessable as capital gains. This is because the right to sue is considered a 'capital asset' and its relinquishment does not constitute a 'transfer' under Section 2(47) for the purpose of capital gains.

PCIT v. Smt. Renu Agarwal
153 Taxmann.com 578 · 2023 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Additions made by the Assessing Officer alleging penny stock transactions and bogus long-term capital gains are rightly deleted if there is no adverse comment from the stock exchange or the company, and no material relating to the assessee is found in the Investigation Wing Report.

Judgement 2018 Puneet Singh v. CIT
310 CTR 817 · Reported
18
citing judgments

The case establishes that for certain types of compensation, specifically enhanced compensation under Section 45(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it is taxable in the year of receipt, not necessarily the year of acquisition. It also touches upon the application of Section 145B(1) regarding the method of accounting for such income.

Anvar Ali Poolakkodan v. ITO
344 CTR 551 · Reported
18
citing judgments

Interest awarded under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on enhanced compensation is exempt under Section 10(37) if the land acquired was agricultural.

Karnataka in Bhoruka Engineering India Ltd. v. DCIT
356 ITR 25 · 2013 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Disallowing short-term capital loss on the sale of shares is unjustified when the shares were held as an investment and not for trading purposes.

CIT v. V.S. Dempo Company Ltd.
387 ITR 354 · 2016 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

Section 54E deduction is allowable against capital gains assessable under section 50 on depreciable assets. For other provisions, the asset remains a long-term capital asset despite being treated as short-term for section 50.

CIT v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd.
52 ITR 567 · 1964 · Supreme Court
18
citing judgments

Bonus shares are akin to splitting existing shares, not a receipt of new property. Therefore, there is no accretion of wealth or gift involved in their issuance.

S Gopal Reddy v. CIT
181 ITR 378 · 1990 · High Court
18
citing judgments

The six-month period for reinvesting capital gains under Section 54EC is calculated from the date of actual receipt of sale consideration, not the date of transfer or compulsory acquisition.

ACIT v. Biraj Investment Pvt. Ltd.
210 Taxmann 418 · 2012 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Transactions involving the sale of shares within the same group, especially when facilitated by a director's spouse being the MD of the counterparty, can be deemed a colorable device to evade tax on long-term capital gains if there's an absence of genuine delivery of shares.

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City-III v. Ratilal Tarachand Mehta (12.11
110 ITR 71 · 1977 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Lease premiums, salami, or pagadi received for granting tenancy rights are capital receipts, not revenue receipts. This premium is treated as a transfer of a capital asset, exigible to capital gains tax.

Baroda Cement & Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT
158 ITR 636 · 1986 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Compensation received for breach of contract and disposal of the subject-matter is a capital receipt and not assessable as capital gains, as it does not involve a transfer of a capital asset.

Fazalbhoy Investment Co. P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax
176 ITR 523 · 1989 · High Court
17
citing judgments

An assessee's intention at the time of selling land, evidenced by actions like applying for conversion to non-agricultural use and the buyer paying non-agricultural tax and penalties, indicates the land's nature for capital gains purposes.

CIT v. Smt.Thressiamma Abraham
227 ITR 802 · 1997 · High Court
17
citing judgments

When sale consideration is diverted by an overriding title, it is not subjected to tax. This principle applies to situations where a financial institution sells a mortgaged property to recover a loan.

6. C. S. Atwal v. CIT Ludhiana & Another
59 Taxmann.com 359 · 2015 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Capital gains are taxable only when there is a transfer of property, and not merely on the execution of an agreement for sale. The registration of an agreement for sale is crucial for determining the nature and taxability of the transaction.

Manjeet Singh (HUF) Karta Manjeet Singh v. Union of India (CWP No. 15506 of
65 Taxmann.com 160 · 2016 · Reported
17
citing judgments

Interest received on delayed payment of compensation, whether under Section 28 or Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is considered to be in the nature of compensation itself. This is because it is paid to compensate the assessee for the loss of not having the use of the principal compensation amount.

Vijay Bhavani Constructions Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT
9 ITR (Trib) 99 · 2017 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

A slump sale is not a sale of a business, but a sale of individual assets of the business. The consideration received for a slump sale is to be allocated among the assets sold. Capital gains are then to be computed separately for each asset, taking into account its cost of acquisition.

Neeraj Gupta v. ITO
97 Taxmann.com 76 · 2018 · Reported
17
citing judgments

Additions on account of bogus long-term capital gains are deleted when the assessee produces complete evidence of share transactions, including purchase, sale, demat account details, bank payments, and broker statements.

Mumbai) 3. ITO v. Rasiklal N Satra
98 ITD 335 · 2006 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

The exemption under section 54F(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is available for capital gains arising from the transfer of a long-term capital asset that is not a residential house.

CIT v. Arun Kumar Agarwal (HUF)
26 Taxmann.com 113 · 2012 · High Court
17
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer's decision to reject a claim for exemption of long-term capital gains under section 10(38) was influenced by an SEBI inquiry report that only prima facie indicated unfair trade practices by some share brokers, without establishing the assessee's involvement.

CIT v. Tribhuvandas G. Patel
115 ITR 95 · 1978 · High Court
16
citing judgments

A partner retiring from a firm, where disputes are settled out of court through a deed of retirement, may attract capital gains tax under Section 45 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if the retirement constitutes a 'transfer' of their interest.

CIT v. Vimal Chand Golecha
201 ITR 442 · 1993 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Land is an independent, identifiable asset that remains so even after construction. Capital gains from land and buildings can be bifurcated into short-term and long-term, even when sold at a consolidated price, allowing the assessee to claim benefits for long-term gains.

CIT v. Sohan Khan
304 ITR 194 · 2008 · High Court
16
citing judgments

The sale of plots, even if developed from inherited land, is considered a disposal of a capital asset and taxable as capital gains, not business income or 'stock-in-trade'. This applies even if the land was held for a long time and the intention was to sell in piecemeal.

Pr. CIT v. C. Gopalaswamy
384 ITR 307 · 2016 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Deduction under section 54 is allowable even if construction is incomplete or possession is not yet handed over, provided the assessee has entered into an agreement to purchase or invested capital gains towards construction. The utilization of capital gains for construction of a residential house is sufficient to claim the benefit of Section 54.

Pr. CIT v. Jogot Pravinbhai Sarabhai
142 Taxmann.com 247 · 2022 · High Court
15
citing judgments

An investment in shares is not bogus and a transaction is genuine, not penny stock, if shares are retained for over ten years and sold after a long time, particularly when the assessee substantiates the genuineness of the investment.

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mamta Rajivkumar Agarwal
155 Taxmann.com 549 · 2023 · High Court
15
citing judgments

An income-tax addition for bogus long-term capital gains from penny stocks is unjustified if there's no evidence that the assessee or their broker was involved in rigging the share price.

CIT v. Mrs. Shahzada Begum
173 ITR 397 · 1988 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Section 54 deduction for capital gains is available even if the sale deed is not registered at the time of purchase, as long as possession and control of the property are transferred.

CIT vs. Tata Services Ltd. (1980) 122 ITR 594 (Bom), CIT v. Vijay Flexible Containers
195 ITR 28 · 1992 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Transfer of a right to receive capital asset is a transfer of a capital asset. The transfer of the right to receive a capital asset is considered a transfer of a capital asset for the purposes of capital gains tax.

Laurids Knudsen Maskinfabrik Ltd Vs ITO (77 ITD 212), SSI Ltd. v. DCIT (
222 ITR 528 · Reported
15
citing judgments
Tribhuvandas G. Patel v. CIT
236 ITR 515 · 1999 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

A sum received by a partner as their share of the value of goodwill or other amounts upon retirement from a partnership firm is not liable to be taxed as capital gains.

CIT v. K. Raja Gopala Rao
252 ITR 459 · 2001 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Mortgage expenses and interest payable on a mortgage used as part of the purchase consideration are included in the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains on the transfer of property.

J.K. Kashyap v. ACIT
302 ITR 255 · 2008 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Relinquishing rights in a property for consideration constitutes a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, making the assessee liable for capital gains tax under Section 45.

Jai Narayan v. ITO
306 ITR 335 · 2008 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Investment in a new asset must be in the name of the assessee to fulfil the requirements of Section 54F. If the investment is not in the assessee's name, they are not entitled to claim the exemption.

T AIR 1968 SC 114, State Bank of Travelcore v. CIT, (1986) 2 SCC 11, Devsons Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
322 ITR 678 · 2010 · Reported
15
citing judgments

No capital gains tax arises when shares are transferred to a wholly-owned subsidiary without consideration, as the computation mechanism for determining taxable gain fails.

Calcutta in Eveready Industries India Ltd. v. CIT & Anr.
334 ITR 413 · 2011 · High Court
15
citing judgments

The court examines a transaction involving the purchase and sale of UTI units with a short holding period, highlighting the cum-dividend purchase in relation to a booking closing date.

Arjun Malhotra v. CIT
403 ITR 354 · 2018 · High Court
15
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer cannot substitute the 'actual sale consideration' received by an assessee with another figure, such as the 'fair market value', if Section 52 of the Income Tax Act is not applicable.

CIT v. Gauranginiben S. Shodhan Inld. Vs. CIT
45 Taxmann.com 356 · 2014 · High Court
15
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer cannot reduce the value adopted by the assessee based on a Registered Valuer's report if the value is claimed in accordance with the Registered Valuer's estimate. A reference to the DVO for ascertaining fair market value as on 1.4.1981 was not competent prior to the amendment in section 55A with effect from 1.7.2012.

Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Sah Deo v. CIT Bihar and Orissa
82 ITR 464 · 1971 · Reported
15
citing judgments

A single payment made for the acquisition of a lessor's right by a lessee to enjoy lease benefits is considered a payment on capital account, as the general right is a capital asset.

CIT v. Chand Ratan Bagri
329 ITR 356 · 2010 · High Court
15
citing judgments

The forfeiture of convertible warrants does not amount to a 'transfer' within the meaning of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Ashok Kumar Rathi
404 ITR 173 · 2018 · High Court
15
citing judgments

If land is recorded as agricultural land in revenue records, it is considered agricultural land for tax purposes, entitling the assessee to exemption from tax.

CIT v. H K Financiers (P.) Ltd.
61 Taxmann.com 175 · 2015 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Where an assessee has valued investments at cost and classified shares as investments in its books of account, the Assessing Officer cannot treat short-term capital gains arising from the purchase and sale of shares as business income. Such a classification in the books of account, maintaining a clear dichotomy, supports treating the gain as capital gain.

ITO v. K.C. Gopalan
107 Taxmann 591 · 1999 · High Court
14
citing judgments

For exemption under Section 54, an assessee needs to construct or purchase a residential house for their own residence. The sale consideration from the asset sold does not necessarily have to be used for this purchase.

Sudhakar M. Shetty v. ACIT
130 ITD 197 · 2011 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

The taxability of an amount received by a partner upon retirement from a firm depends on the specific mode of retirement and how the accounts are settled, with admission of new partners generally not constituting a taxable transfer.

2013) 40 Taxmann.com 141. (p) Shree Cement Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (Jaipur ITAT)
152 ITD 561 · 2014 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Income received from the sale of Carbon Credits is a capital receipt and not chargeable to tax. This is based on previous decisions from the Tribunal, including the jurisdictional ITAT, Mumbai.

CIT v. Rasiklal Maneklal (HUF)
177 ITR 198 · 1989 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

An exchange is a mutual transfer of ownership of one thing for the ownership of another. This definition of exchange is consistent with the definition of 'transfer' under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which includes exchange or relinquishment of an asset.

73 (Hyd.) (Trib.) (c) Narasimha Raju Rudra Raju v. ACIT
19 Taxmann.com 17 · 2012 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Possession of a flat within the stipulated period is necessary for claiming deductions under Section 54F.

Fort Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT and CIT v. Fort Properties Pvt. Ltd.
208 ITR 232 · 1994 · High Court
14
citing judgments

The profit or gains from the transfer of a capital asset are assessable to capital gains tax, even if the asset was classified as 'stock in trade'. The determination of whether income is capital gain or business income depends on the attendant facts and circumstances, not solely on classification in books of accounts.

CIT v. Khoobchand M. Makhija
223 Taxmann 189 · 2014 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Investment in two different flats at separate locations can be allowed as deduction under Section 54 if they are converted into a single duplex flat.

Orient Trading Co. Ltd. v. CIT
224 ITR 371 · 1997 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

The exchange of shares of one company for shares of another company constitutes a realization of the shares of the first company, and the difference in value is chargeable income. Consequently, a loss on a similar exchange is also allowable.

V.S.M.R.Jagadish Chandran v. CIT
227 ITR 240 · 1997 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

Where a successor discharges a mortgage created by a previous owner, the amount paid to clear the mortgage debt is considered the cost of acquiring the mortgagee's interest in the property, deductible as the cost of acquisition under section 48 of the Income-tax Act.