Tavant Technologies India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT, Circle 7(1)(1), Bangalore

120 Taxmann.com 122Reported decision2020#13329 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2023.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Tavant Technologies India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT, Circle 7(1)(1), Bangalore

M/S. SPRINKLR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6(1)(2), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 250/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am It(Tp)A No.250/Bang/2022 : Asst.Year 2017-2018 & Sa No.22/Bang/2022 M/S.Sprinklr India Private Limited The Deputy Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, East Wing Building Income-Tax, Circle 6(1)(2) V. Bengaluru. No.3, Block B, Divyashree 770 Town Centre, Off Hal Airport Road, Yamlur P.O. Bengaluru – 560 037. Pan : Aaqcs9370N. (Appellant/Applicant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sri.Tata Krishna, Advocate Respondent By : Sri.Sumeer Singh Meena, Cit-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 15.07.2022 Date Of Hearing : 13.07.2022 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm : This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Final Assessment Order Dated 18.02.2022. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2017-2018. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are As Follows: The Assessee Is A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Of Sprinklr Us. It Provides Software Development Services To Its Parent Company. For The Assessment Year 2017-2018, The Return Of Income Was Filed On 31.10.2017 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.24,99,66,540. The Assessment Was Selected For Scrutiny & Notice U/S 143(2) Of The I.T.Act Was Issued. During The 2 It(Tp)A No.250/Bang/2022 & Sa 22/B/2022. M/S.Sprinklr India Private Limited. Course Of Assessment Proceedings, The Matter Was Referred To The Transfer Pricing Officer (Tpo) To Determine The Arm’S Length Price (Alp) Of The International Transaction Undertaken By The Assessee With Its Associated Enterprises (Aes). The Tpo Vide His Order U/S 92Ca Of The I.T.Act Dated 27.01.2021 Determined The Tp Adjustment Of Rs.12,63,71,153. The Details Of The Tp Adjustment Made By The Tpo Reads As Follows:-

For Appellant: Sri.Tata Krishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sumeer Singh Meena, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, JM & Ms.Padmavathy S, AM IT(TP)A No.250/Bang/2022 : Asst.Year 2017-2018 & SA No.22/Bang/2022 M/s.Sprinklr India Private Limited The Deputy Commissioner of 3rd Floor, East Wing Building Income-tax, Circle 6(1)(2) v. Bengaluru. No.3, Block B, Divyashree 770 Town Centre, Off HAL Airport Road, Yamlur P.O. Bengaluru – 560 037. PAN : AAQCS9370N. (Appellant/Applicant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.Tata Krishna, Advocate Respondent by : Sri.Sumeer Singh Meena, CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 15.07.2022 Date of Hearing : 1…

M/S. APTEAN INDIA PVT. LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BENGALURU

In the result, appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2638/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.2638/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Aptean India Private Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Formerly Aptean Software India Pvt. Ltd.,) Circle -1(1)(1), Level-5 (8Th Floor), Golden Heights, Bengaluru. No.1/2, 59Th C Cross, 4Th M Block, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010. Pan : Aaccp 7154 M Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri. G. S. Prashanth, Ca Respondent By : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 28.10.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.11.2021 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 11.10.2017 Of Dcit, Circle 1(1)(2), Bengaluru, Passed Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called The ‘Act’) Relating To Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Assessee In Engaged In The Business Of Provision Of Software Development Services (Swd Services), To Its Wholly Owned Holding Company. In Terms Of The Provisions Of Sec.92-A Of The Act, The Assessee & Its Wholly Owned Holding Company Were Associated Enterprises

For Appellant: Shri. G. S. Prashanth, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 92Section 92(1)Section 92B(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.2638/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/s. Aptean India Private Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (formerly Aptean Software India Pvt. Ltd.,) Circle -1(1)(1), Level-5 (8th Floor), Golden Heights, Bengaluru. No.1/2, 59th C Cross, 4th M Block, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010. PAN : AACCP 7154 M APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri. G. S. Prashanth, CA Respondent by : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing :…

Tavant Technologies India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT, Circle 7(1)(1), Bangalore (120 Taxmann.com 122) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax