SumatiDayal v. CIT 214 ITR
207 ITR 89High Court1994#2962 most cited
What is SumatiDayal v. CIT 214 ITR authority for?
Authorities are entitled to pierce the corporate veil to examine the reality of a transaction and to look into surrounding circumstances to determine if it is sham, illusory, a device, or a ruse.
40
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Sumati Dayal v CIT · CIT v L.N. Dalmia · piercing the corporate veil · sham transaction · illusory transaction · device or ruse · surrounding circumstances · source of funds · cash credits
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing SumatiDayal v. CIT 214 ITR
Showing 1–20 of 40 · Page 1 of 2