SumatiDayal v. CIT 214 ITR

207 ITR 89High Court1994#2962 most cited

What is SumatiDayal v. CIT 214 ITR authority for?

Authorities are entitled to pierce the corporate veil to examine the reality of a transaction and to look into surrounding circumstances to determine if it is sham, illusory, a device, or a ruse.

40

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Sumati Dayal v CIT · CIT v L.N. Dalmia · piercing the corporate veil · sham transaction · illusory transaction · device or ruse · surrounding circumstances · source of funds · cash credits

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing SumatiDayal v. CIT 214 ITR

Showing 120 of 40 · Page 1 of 2