STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. REKESH KOHLI AND ANOTHER. 8

2 SCC 665Reported decision1980#993 most cited

What is STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. REKESH KOHLI AND ANOTHER. 8 authority for?

To prove criminal conspiracy, direct or circumstantial evidence must demonstrate an agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence. The prosecution must establish a meeting of minds or, if inferred from circumstances, show a conclusive and irresistible inference of such an agreement.

108

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2021.

Also referred to as

State of MP v Rekesh Kohli · V.C. Shukla v State (Delhi Admn) · criminal conspiracy · proof of conspiracy · evidence of agreement · meeting of minds · circumstantial evidence · irresistible inference · essential elements of conspiracy · 1980 2 SCC 665

Judgments citing STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. REKESH KOHLI AND ANOTHER. 8

Showing 120 of 108 · Page 1 of 6

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH v. REKESH KOHLI AND ANOTHER. 8 (2 SCC 665) — Cited in 108 Judgments | BharatTax