ACIT, NCC - 11 (1),, CHENNAI vs. SHRI SAMBANDAM DORAIRAJ,, CHENNAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 301/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2021AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.301/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14
For Appellant: Mr. K. Meenakshi Sundaram, ITPFor Respondent: Mr. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 54
…uced by both parties. The following case laws support the proposition that strict proof is not necessary for reaching a decision in income tax matters; (i) CIT vs. Smt. Vimalaben Bhagavandhas Patel (1979) 118 ITR 134 (Guj) (ii) Anraj Narain Dass vs CIT (1951) 20 ITR 562 (Punj) (iii) Laxmin Co vs CIT (1959) 37 ITR 461 (All) (iv) Devi Dass Madhav Prasad vs CIT (1967) 63 ITR 356 (All) 9.1 The Income Tax Officer has discretion to take into account the principle of preponderance of probabilities and the facts of a case has to be appreciated in the light of the above legal principles and the facts obtained in an impugn…